1997issue C061-7

Streamline trading rules until the signals agree

A trading procedure can be built from a few noncorrelated methods. Keep those that do not repeat each other, wait until they agree, and treat a low-probable entry as a reason to sit out.

Build the procedure from three noncorrelated methods rather than from one combined, increasingly complex approach.
Take a trigger only when noncorrelated methods, including momentum, point in the same direction as a directional wave reading.
Treat several open wave scenarios as a low-probable entry and a reason not to trade.
Test a new technique only against a named problem, and skip the session if the required mindset is absent.

Entries in this reading1 entry

Current trackTrading psychology process376 readings

Build one procedure from fewer methods

The archive describes a trading-psychology-process: a decision procedure that turns rule inputs, market state, and execution constraints into an entry, exit, or abstention signal over the system's holding period.

A trading procedure can be built from three noncorrelated methods rather than from one combined, increasingly complex approach. Noncorrelated-methods are separate analytical tools kept because they do not repeat the same information.

Early study often adds many techniques into one approach. Later work is to drop redundant indicators and repair weaknesses in those that remain.

Judge a turn, then wait for agreement

An indicator-on-indicator applies a second reading to an existing indicator so a turn can be judged before the first indicator's usual signal. A composite index on a relative-strength reading is one case: it can show a signal before the first indicator does.

Wave counts are used after momentum and Gann work, and only when the count fits what those indicators already show. A trigger is taken only when noncorrelated methods, including momentum, point in the same direction as a directional wave reading.

Several open wave scenarios count as a low-probable-entry: a setup that should be skipped because competing scenarios remain open.

DJIA quarterly from 1962 through April 1997

Brown’s quarterly Dow plot is the scale check behind her three-method rule: momentum already treated the 1987 low as a second wave, so the next break was meant to be a fourth-wave correction rather than a new bear, with higher highs still ahead. Index levels were read off the printed September 1962–April 1997 quarterly chart, not from a table, so they are approximate.DJIA · quarter · 1962-09-01T00:00:00.000Z to 1997-04-30T00:00:00.000Z

Elliott labels on the source treat 1987 as wave 2, not wave 4. A late spike toward 10000 past the last 1997 print looks like a projection and was not read as a printed price. Early 1962–82 bars sit in a narrow band on a 0–10000 scale, so those years are sampled coarsely.

Fix a named weakness

A new technique is tested only against a named problem and compared with the current procedure, not adopted because it is new. That is problem-first-testing: try the technique only when a specific weakness in the current procedure needs a fix, then compare it with what is already in use.

In some short-horizon markets, knowing methods that influence local participants is treated as required for competitive execution.

The decision process includes a daily fitness check. If the required mindset is absent, the session is treated as one the trader does not have the right to take. Abstention then belongs to the same procedure as entry and exit.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.

30 of 89 in the Trading psychology process track

19981-4 pp.Next on Trading psychology processHappiness as a tradable decision processWorry, excitement-seeking, and postponed permission act as execution constraints that change which system signals a trader will actually follow.

All readings on this track · 89 readings

By fieldDecision process416 readings By year199791 readings

All 376 readings tagged Trading psychology process

Also on Trading psychology process5 readings

1984Critiquing reward bias, single-scale charts, and exact-turn forecasts 1985Treat a shared mechanical printout as a public script 1985Event-class hazards and pre-trade survival checks 1986Fear signals an untested decision process 1986Construct a decision procedure that revises itself