1985issue C051-3
Treat a shared mechanical printout as a public script
Operators who feed the same risk-reward, beta, and theta calculations into machines can reach matching unload instructions. After a decision is taken, price often moves against the expectation because the printout rarely names an adversary.
- Operators who feed the same risk-reward, beta, and theta calculations into machines can reach matching selection and timing conclusions, so a sell instruction meets other machines that also read unload.
- Indicator readings can be interpreted correctly and still fail, because the outcome favored by the form sheet does not always occur and the missing factor is often an adversary.
- A widely known market pattern draws unanimity that induces contrary-action, and a novel method attracts countermoves until the method is neutralized.
- A game-theory tactic for fluctuation traders is to maximize gain and minimize loss regardless of direction, for example by treating seven advances in the last ten sessions as a 70 percent continuation assumption and playing both long and short.
Matching machines issue the same unload
A mechanical-trading-system is a rule set that converts shared risk-reward, beta, theta, and similar terminal inputs into timed entry, exit, or unload instructions. Operators who feed the same risk-reward, beta, and theta calculations into machines can reach matching selection and timing conclusions, so a sell instruction meets other machines that also read unload.
The form sheet omits the adversary
Indicator readings can be interpreted correctly and still fail because the outcome favored by the form sheet does not always occur. After a decision is taken, price often moves against the expectation, and the factor that rarely appears on the printout is an adversary. An adversary is the opposing interest that acts against a plan once that plan is published or widely copied.
Unlike physical nature, which does not change tested behavior to deny an observer, a widely known market pattern draws unanimity that induces contrary-action. Contrary-action is the reversal that appears when too many participants adopt the same established behavior pattern. A novel method attracts countermoves until the method is neutralized and a new equilibrium is reached.
When the contest becomes fund versus fund
If the public concentrates capital in large funds and managed accounts, the contest shifts from customer versus customer to fund versus fund and can settle into four-decimal stability. A prolonged narrow trading range can leave fluctuation-seeking traders without a usable two-way move on either the upside or the downside. Grid-lock is a state in which many operators reach the same computerized conclusion and two-way fluctuation collapses toward a narrow standoff.
Fluctuation trading is a psychological venture
Trading short-term fluctuations is a psychological venture and is not the same procedure as long-horizon investing based on fundamental research. A trading-psychology-process is a procedure that treats short-horizon fluctuation trading as an attempt to read combined participant intent rather than as a long-horizon fundamental appraisal. The same public tape and terminal data still produce opposed decisions.
A tactic that does not depend on direction
Game-theory is a two-sided decision frame that treats other participants as an adaptive opponent and seeks a tactic usable whichever way price moves. A game-theory tactic for fluctuation traders is to maximize gain and minimize loss regardless of direction, for example by treating seven advances in the last ten sessions as a 70 percent continuation assumption and playing both long and short.
A later game-theory layer is expected, in time, to reach the same grid-lock as earlier computerized methods.
All readings on this track · 22 readings
- 1985Treat a shared mechanical printout as a public script
- 1988Pessimistic margin ranking for mechanical systems
- 1991From a differenced-average sketch to coded rules
- 2003Commodity enthusiasm is not a complete system
- 2005Reader surveys as system evaluation checklists
- 2008Critiquing unchanged mechanical signals in evolving markets
- 2010Read a mechanical trading system catalog as a specification checklist
- 2011Specify mechanical system signals as one testable procedure
- 2012Treat a packaged mechanical system as one inspectable procedure
- 2013Mechanical trading systems as complete signal procedures
- 2013Testable cycle rules as one procedure
- 2014Evaluate mechanical trading systems as one procedure
- 2015Mechanical trading systems as one testable procedure
- 2016Evaluating mechanical trading systems as testable procedures
- 2016Reading a systems catalog as one mechanical procedure
- 2018Mechanical systems as testable signal procedures
- 2019Treat mechanical system listings as specification audits
- 2019Match the automation stack to mechanical system constraints
- 2019Bar size as a mechanical system construction constraint
- 2020Interrogating mechanical system listings as one procedure
- 2020Mechanical systems still need emotion rules
- 2020Comfort, not theory, keeps mechanical rules in use