Skip to main content
Track Trading psychology process
15 / 89
Library

1995issue C011

Evaluating emotional overrides in a rule-based decision procedure

A psychology self-audit is useful only when it tests whether live entries, exits, and sits-out still match the written rules. The historical workflow asks whether results would more closely match the system's expectations if those rules were followed, and whether major losses have to be recouped after they were not.

  • Editorial reading: treat the person running the book as part of the decision procedure, and use a self-audit only to test whether live entries, exits, and sits-out still match the written rules.
  • One self-check asks whether results would more closely match the system's expectations if the written rules were followed, and whether bodily discomfort appears on a regular basis.
  • A further self-check asks whether major losses repeatedly have to be recouped because rules were not followed, a loss recoup after a rule departure.
  • The same sequence of stress, outburst, and outcome can repeat as a recurring negative pattern, with held tension after the episode.
Entries in this reading1 entry

The person running the book

The historical workflow places psychology self-checks next to the written rules. One self-check asks whether results would more closely match the system's expectations if those written rules were followed.

TradersWeek editorial reading: treat the person running the book as part of the decision procedure. Entry, exit, and abstention rules are evaluated together as one process. A self-audit is useful only when it tests whether live entries, exits, and sits-out still match the written rules, or whether an emotional recovery loop has replaced them.

Company, body, and self-attack

That same self-check asks whether others enjoy the trader's company and whether bodily discomfort appears on a regular basis.

It also asks about criticism of self and others, ongoing disappointment from unmet expectations, feeling unappreciated or unloved, and a wish to retaliate.

It includes a question about self-destructive behavior, with smoking, drinking, drugs, and gambling given as examples.

Loss recoup after a rule departure

A further self-check asks whether major losses repeatedly have to be recouped because rules were not followed. This article calls that a loss recoup: trading meant to recover a large loss after a rule departure.

It asks whether family and friends show discomfort or insecurity because of the trader's actions, and whether someone has named a problem that was then dismissed.

Held tension and recurring negative patterns

The further self-check asks about excused mood swings, how often excessive blowups occur, and how long tension is held. This article calls lasting tightness held tension: physical or emotional tightness that persists after a trading episode.

It asks what happens before and after those episodes, whether negative experiences repeat as patterns, and how severe a fall must be before a problem is admitted. This article calls that repeated sequence a recurring negative pattern: the same sequence of stress, outburst, and outcome repeating across episodes.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
15 of 89 in the Trading psychology process track
19951-4 pp.Next on Trading psychology processConstruct centering into entry, exit, and abstentionA usable procedure is described as committed objectives, management of emotion and fear, and adherence to a written strategy.
All readings on this track · 89 readings
  1. 1988Habitual decision style can override a trading system's rules under stress
  2. 1988Abstention and self-checks complete the procedure
  3. 1988When packaged systems replace a testable decision process
  4. 1991Fighting market direction as a process failure
  5. 1993Replacing beliefs that override a testable trading procedure
  6. 1993Fear as a named constraint in entry and exit rules
  7. 1993Body state on the trading checklist
  8. 1994When fear vetoes a tested trading system
  9. 1994Slump recovery as a testable decision procedure
  10. 1994Hesitation as an incomplete decision process
  11. 1994Trading weaknesses as testable process inputs
  12. 1994Mental imagery as an unlogged execution filter
  13. 1994Comfort-zone overrides of testable trade rules
  14. 1995Emotion rebound as a system rule failure
  15. 1995Evaluating emotional overrides in a rule-based decision procedure
  16. 1995Construct centering into entry, exit, and abstention
  17. 1995Resistance-audit for trading rule construction
  18. 1995Single-mode thinking leaves gaps in trading decisions
  19. 1995Psychology is the trading system's execution layer
  20. 1995Operator burnout as decision-process failure
  21. 1995When success breaks the trading procedure
  22. 1996Between-trade recovery as one decision procedure
  23. 1996Isolation in a losing stretch belongs in the written procedure
  24. 1996When goal proximity overrides one trading procedure
  25. 1996When emotional overload breaks testable rules
  26. 1996Trader-created losses as decision procedure failures
  27. 1996Inner commentary as an unlogged system override
  28. 1997Inner forecasts that override system hold rules
  29. 1997A conscious rebuild of trading rules after change
  30. 1997Streamline trading rules until the signals agree
  31. 1998Happiness as a tradable decision process
  32. 1998Warfare metaphors as untested trading rules
  33. 1998Constructing a generosity gate for trade decisions
  34. 1998Why trading systems need a sensory decision base
  35. 1999Shock, abstention, and the decision handoff
  36. 1999Rewrite trading nightmares before they become rules
  37. 1999Anxiety as a trading-system construction checkpoint
  38. 1999When revenge replaces the abstention rule
  39. 2001Money beliefs that veto trading rules
  40. 2001Ignored sells need an execution filter
  41. 2001Courage fails unless trading rules are written and tested
  42. 2003When compulsion rewrites the trading procedure
  43. 2004When tested rules fail to fire
  44. 2004Precommit exits when regret outweighs pride
  45. 2005Audit personal stories before blaming the trading rules
  46. 2005Why tested systems still fail at execution
  47. 2007Losing streaks test the whole procedure
  48. 2007Pre-trade protection rules for surprise declines
  49. 2007Defensiveness rewrites testable trading rules
  50. 2008Observer-self as a filter for entry, exit, and abstention
  51. 2008The holding-period rule for post-fill arousal
  52. 2010Treat psychology as part of the trading procedure
  53. 2010Normalized volatility as a testable regime switch
  54. 2012Post-loss self-talk as an intraday rule-input
  55. 2012Write uncertainty into one trading procedure
  56. 2012Milestone rallies need entry, exit and abstention rules
  57. 2012Mental fitness as the missing decision rule
  58. 2012Session close is a flatten rule, not overnight hope
  59. 2012A signal without a sit-out is not a system
  60. 2012Beliefs that rewrite system entry and exit signals
  61. 2012Live loss rewrites the rule-based decision process
  62. 2013Market access as a missing system rule
  63. 2013Skipped exits and the unplanned hold
  64. 2013Test entry, exit, and abstention as one procedure
  65. 2013Crowd sentiment as one testable decision loop
  66. 2013Keep social noise outside the rule set
  67. 2014Community feeds versus testable decision rules
  68. 2014Outcome control versus testable execution rules
  69. 2014Liquidity eligibility as a testable system rule
  70. 2015When the fill replaces the hold rule
  71. 2015When loss aversion overrides testable hold and exit rules
  72. 2015Pause and objectify before trade decisions
  73. 2015Clutch delivery as the unfinished trading rule
  74. 2016The failure protocol inside a trading decision process
  75. 2016When trading psychology becomes a testable process
  76. 2016Psychology belongs inside the trading rule set, not beside it
  77. 2016Trader maturity stages as a critique of an unfinished decision process
  78. 2017Quiet volatility is not a complete trading process
  79. 2017The plan-trust gap after live-testing
  80. 2017When a winning hold is not system adaptation
  81. 2017Risk-first rules instead of year-ahead forecasts
  82. 2018Why-first stories leak the tape test for entry, exit and abstention
  83. 2018Replace intuition with a testable decision procedure
  84. 2018Make regret a testable stand-aside input
  85. 2018Exit rules over fear when volatility returns
  86. 2018When inherited instincts override trading-system rules
  87. 2018Averaging down as hope substitution after a seed loss
  88. 2018Click rankings cannot replace a testable decision procedure
  89. 2020Living-cost pressure as an untested trading constraint
All 376 readings tagged Trading psychology process
Also on Trading psychology process5 readings