Skip to main content
Track ABC correction
5 / 18
Library

1990issue C031-7

Calendar windows for three-wave pullbacks

A reaction is treated as complete only when three down waves finish from a peak and the third low falls within one calendar day of a 42-, 49-, or 55-day count. The recorded cases then wait for a signal day and write a nearby stop under the prior low before the first rebound close.

  • A reaction is complete only when the third down wave lands inside a 42-, 49-, or 55-day calendar-day window; two waves into day 42 remain unfinished.
  • A location count to the second low and last rebound high is used to judge which of the three terminal windows is still live.
  • After a window-qualified third low, the signal day is the first close one-half point above the prior high without a new low, and a nearby stop is written before entry.
  • Four down waves into the same calendar count, usually on day 55, can still complete, and the final low is never a higher low.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Editorial frame

Editorial reading: treat a three-wave pullback as a dated experiment, not a named pattern. Mark the 42-, 49-, and 55-day appointments as soon as a peak prints. A case exists only if the third down wave lands inside one of those windows and a nearby stop can be written under the prior low before the first rebound close.

Editorial reading: the historical charts teach that sequence, structure first, calendar filter second, invalidation last.

When a reaction is complete

An ABC correction is a three-leg decline from a peak in which only the third down wave can complete the reaction. A two-wave pause is unfinished, and a four-wave finish into the same window can still count.

A reaction is treated as complete only when three down waves finish from a peak and the third low falls within one calendar day of a 42-, 49-, or 55-day count. Two waves down into day 42 are not a completion; a later third leg into day 55 remains possible. Four down waves into the same calendar count, usually on day 55, are still accepted.

The final low is never a higher low. A double-low shape is allowed, and the last rebound high may exceed the prior high.

Where the count may start

A double top can serve as the count origin. If identical highs span several sessions or a weekend, the count may start on whichever date produces a valid calendar landing when the three-wave shape is already clear. A February start can finish one day short of the usual one-day tolerance.

Calendar-day windows and location counts

A calendar-day window is one of the three dated targets measured from the peak, plus one day either side, where a third-wave low is allowed to complete. The three terminal windows are described as about equally common.

A location count is an intermediate day count to the second low and last rebound high, used to judge which of the three terminal windows is still live. A second low near days 19 to 22 often precedes a last high near days 34 to 38 and a finish near day 42. A finish near day 55 often has a second low near days 28 to 32 and a last high near days 42 to 46.

Volume and the third selling day

Each down wave often includes at least a sharp three-day selloff, with volume expanding at the lows. A short-term position is delayed until after that third selling day.

Signal day and the time stop

After a third-wave low inside a window, the recorded signal is the first close one-half point above the prior high that does not print a lower low. That session is the signal day. The case-study stop is then set about one and one-half points below the prior day's low.

A time stop is the pre-marked 42-, 49-, or 55-day calendar window that decides whether a third-wave low is on time, paired with that nearby protective stop written before entry so exposure is bounded if the rebound fails.

Four historical cases

In the Compaq case, a June 2 peak produced a second low on day 28, a last high on day 46, and a final low on day 56. Volume expanded at the June 16, June 30, and July 26 lows, and a two-point stop under the July 26 low is the recorded invalidation.

Three later cases use the same construction. Pfizer completed three down waves in 55 days from a July 1 peak to an August 25 low. Federal National Mortgage Co. counted from the February 10 side of a January 29 / February 10 double top to a March 30 1988 low on day 49. Temple-Inland fell from a February 8 1989 peak, made a second low at 21 days, and a third low on March 23 at 43 days.

Editorial note: Compaq's day-28 second low and day-46 last high sit on the path that often finishes near day 55. Temple-Inland's 21-day second low and 43-day third low sit on the path that often finishes near day 42. Pfizer lands on the 55-day window and Federal National Mortgage Co. on the 49-day window; those two cases are not given intermediate location counts.

Compaq Computer three-wave reaction, June–July 1983

Compaq’s close series from the June 2 peak through the July 28 third-wave low shows the 42/49/55-day setup in its textbook form: a 28-day second low, a 46-day last top, then a last drop from 96 to 84.5 that finishes on day 56. A trader should see the calendar windows first and only then the nearby stop under the July 26 low. Prices were read off the plotted daily close path in Figure 1, not taken from a table.
Compaq’s close series from the June 2 peak through the July 28 third-wave low shows the 42/49/55-day setup in its textbook form: a 28-day second low, a 46-day last top, then a last drop from 96 to 84.5 that finishes on day 56. A trader should see the calendar windows first and only then the nearby stop under the July 26 low. Prices were read off the plotted daily close path in Figure 1, not taken from a table.Compaq Computer (CPQ) · daily · 1983-06-02T00:00:00.000Z to 1983-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Daily closes digitized from the printed Compaq chart (Figure 1). Wave labels and the 96 to 84-1/2 last-leg range are those the article states; intermediate closes are approximate to the raster.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
5 of 18 in the ABC correction track
19901-8 pp.Next on ABC correctionLabeling wave 1, B, or X after a five-wave CAfter a five-wave C of sufficient range, the next structure is constructed as wave 1, wave B, or wave X.
All readings on this track · 18 readings
  1. 1986Copper wave degree and channel objectives
  2. 1987Constructing a price-time Fibonacci window for the ABC correction
  3. 1989Building entry and exit rules from pivots, channels, and abc-corrections
  4. 1989Constructing ABC Fibonacci expansion objectives
  5. 1990Calendar windows for three-wave pullbacks
  6. 1990Labeling wave 1, B, or X after a five-wave C
  7. 1991Constructing an Elliott zigzag with ABC Fibonacci checkpoints
  8. 2002Constructing Elliott wave ABC and triangle pattern counts
  9. 2003A bear-market bounce as a second wave, an RSI nonconfirmation, and an ABC relabel
  10. 2004A pretrade risk lockbox at Elliott ABC ends
  11. 2005Three-check identification of an ABC pause in an uptrend
  12. 2005The 61.8 percent Fibonacci line as a zigzag kill-switch
  13. 2005Constructing volume-float channels for ABC corrections
  14. 2008When monthly wave counts split, freeze the ABC and Fibonacci brackets
  15. 2012Fiery bull construction from sector thrust to wave count
  16. 2013Critiquing rigid Elliott wave ratios after computerized trading
  17. 2018V-wave count construction from impulse and ABC corrections
  18. 2018Constructing short hypotheses from completed ABC corrections
All 21 readings tagged ABC correction
Also on ABC correction5 readings