Skip to main content
Track Optimal f sizing
9 / 12
Library

2001issue C071-5

Bounded crash risk with capital units and optimal f

Independent-event wipeout paths, capital-unit risk of ruin, and growth fractions from Kelly criterion and optimal f are before-entry bounds on how much of the account one trade may risk. Editorial reading: count the crash paths a single oversized stake can open, split the account until those paths become rare, then apply a growth fraction only to the surviving unit.

  • Independent-event strings multiply single-trade chances: a four-event even-odds string is 0.0625, and an all-in 0.60-win and 0.40-loss process reaches 0.496 ruin in three or fewer trades and 0.542 once distinct paths through five trades are added.
  • Risk of ruin is the before-entry bound. At a 0.20 trading advantage it is 67 percent with one capital unit, 44 percent with two, and about 3 percent with ten; the same ten units still leave roughly 35 percent ruin at a 5 percent advantage.
  • Fixed-percentage sizing cuts the next dollar stake after a loss, so a losing streak drains the account more slowly than a constant dollar unit.
  • With success probability 0.60 and a profit-to-loss ratio of 3, the growth-maximizing fraction is 0.47. A 0.30 hit rate with a profit-to-loss ratio of 4 still has a defined optimal fraction of 12.5 percent.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A before-entry bound on stake size

Risk of ruin is the chance that a run of independent losses exhausts the account, used as a before-entry bound on stake size. An independent event is an outcome whose chance does not change because of the prior trade, so a string of results is the product of the single-trade chances.

Capital units are how many equal slices the account is cut into before one loss can finish the game. Trading advantage is long-run winning share minus losing share, used as the edge input when estimating wipeout chance.

Independent wipeout paths

When successive outcomes are independent, the chance of a four-event even-odds string is 0.0625.

A 0.60-win and 0.40-loss process that risks the entire stake has a first-trade wipeout chance of 0.40, a win-then-two-loss path of 0.096, and a three-or-fewer-trade ruin chance of 0.496. Adding the distinct wipeout paths through five trades on that same all-in 0.60 and 0.40 process produces a ruin chance of 0.542.

Capital units and risk of ruin

With a trading advantage of 0.20 and one capital unit, long-run ruin chance is 67 percent. Two equal units lower it to 44 percent.

At a 20 percent trading advantage, ten capital units reduce wipeout chance to about 3 percent. At a 5 percent advantage the same ten units still leave roughly 35 percent ruin.

Fixed-percentage sizing

Fixed-percentage sizing resets the dollar stake as a constant share of the current balance after each result so a losing streak automatically shrinks the next risk. After a loss, a fixed fraction of remaining equity reduces the next dollar stake, so a losing streak drains the account more slowly than a constant dollar unit.

Kelly criterion and optimal f

Profit-loss ratio is average winning-trade dollars divided by average losing-trade dollars. Kelly criterion is a growth-rate fraction of equity set from win probability and payoff ratio so the next loss stays a bounded slice of the account. Optimal f is the single fraction of current capital that maximizes long-run growth for a stated win probability and profit-to-loss ratio.

With success probability 0.60 and an average profit-to-loss ratio of 3, the growth-maximizing fraction of capital is 0.47. A 0.30 hit rate with a profit-to-loss ratio of 4 still has a defined optimal fraction of 12.5 percent.

Editorial. TradersWeek applies that fraction only to the unit that remains after wipeout paths have been counted and the account has been split. The growth rule is not treated as a substitute for the ruin bound.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
9 of 12 in the Optimal f sizing track
20021-5 pp.Next on Optimal f sizingOptimal f sizing and risk of ruin as exposure filtersOptimal f sizing takes a fixed fraction of capital from historical results to maximize geometric growth, then divides that fraction by the largest loss to set contract count.
All readings on this track · 12 readings
  1. 1990Constructing optimal f when trade sizes differ
  2. 1993Portfolio heat, optimal f, and drawdown limits
  3. 1994Construct historical-optimum-leverage from one equity-path
  4. 1995Optimal f as a leverage bound for commodity account growth
  5. 1998Secure f keeps Optimal f sizing inside a Drawdown limit
  6. 1998Optimal f contract counts versus equity fractions
  7. 1999Match futures starting capital to system risk
  8. 1999Search system inputs together with Optimal f sizing
  9. 2001Bounded crash risk with capital units and optimal f
  10. 2002Optimal f sizing and risk of ruin as exposure filters
  11. 2003Cap ruin and drawdown before optimal-f
  12. 2006Ruin odds, the Kelly fraction and optimal f as size filters
All 12 readings tagged Optimal f sizing
Also on Optimal f sizing5 readings