Skip to main content
Track Paper trading simulation
9 / 24
Library

2011issue C0748-58

How to turn an FDA-calendar sample into a testable bio-runup procedure

A 2010 FDA-calendar sample of 59 panel and PDUFA runups is treated here as one procedure: define the holding window, exclude the binary announcement day, compare alternative lookbacks, and only then decide whether a rumor-runup rule is even tradable.

  • The intended bio-runup procedure is to participate in the pre-decision speculative rally and exit before the panel or pdufa-date announcement, not to hold through the binary decision.
  • The 2010 sample used a small-cap-filter below one billion dollars and measured each runup over 44 trading days so larger names and holiday gaps would not lift the averages.
  • On the panel-date table, the raw-except-five-days window posted the strongest average result. The unfiltered raw position and the six-week and four-week prior windows were weaker.
  • A companion environment can show strategy signals on a list, map, or chart, apply dynamic strategy and time-frame optimization, and step a candidate rule through a paper-brokerage-simulator before it is treated as a live procedure.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A sample is not a slogan

A one-year FDA calendar can be written as a mechanical trading system rather than as a rumor. The editorial aim of this archive note is to show that sequence: define the holding window, exclude the announcement day, compare alternative lookbacks, and only then decide whether a bio-runup rule is even tradable.

The archive facts describe a historical workflow. They do not, by themselves, say that a rumor-runup rule belongs on a live desk.

How the 2010 sample was built

The 2010 FDA-calendar sample contained 59 panel or PDUFA runups. The study concentrated on companies valued under $1 billion. That small-cap-filter was applied so larger names would not improve the reported averages.

Each runup was measured over two months of trading data, specified as 44 trading days, to limit holiday interference in the window.

Compare the holding windows first

Among the compared holding windows, the raw-except-five-days method showed the strongest average result in the panel-date table. That window is long from two months before the FDA panel date until five days before it. The table reported a 13.29% return with 4.89% average risk.

The same panel-date table reported much weaker averages for the other windows. The unfiltered raw position showed a 2.55% return with 5.10% average risk. The six-week-prior window showed a -0.26% return with 1.84% average risk. The four-week-prior window showed a -1.82% return with 0.93% average risk.

Editorial reading: the comparison is the decision point. A rumor-runup idea is not treated as tradable until the alternative lookbacks have been placed on the same table.

Exit before the announcement

The intended procedure is to participate in the pre-decision speculative rally and exit before the FDA announcement rather than hold through the binary decision itself. In this design, a pdufa-date or panel date ends the pre-announcement holding period. The announcement day is not part of the trade.

That is why the holding window is specified before any live-desk reading is allowed. Entry, exit, and abstention from the binary day are one procedure.

Optimize the signals, then paper-trade them

A companion software environment can display prebuilt or custom strategy signals on a list, map, or chart. Version 8.0 applies dynamic strategy and time-frame optimization to those signals.

The same environment includes playback and a paper-brokerage-simulator whose account settings can match a live desk. A candidate rule can be stepped through historical data before it is treated as a live procedure.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
9 of 24 in the Paper trading simulation track
201234-39 pp.Next on Paper trading simulationFirst-hour countertrend entries after broken levelsThe procedure is a first-hour, one-stock, real-time long-and-short workflow limited to two to five round trips before any later expansion to more names.
All readings on this track · 24 readings
  1. 1988Process goals, journals, and pre-trade stress checks
  2. 1989A written plan before impulse takes command
  3. 1991Step-through construction of a currency range tactic
  4. 1999Relocating expiration break-even with a bull debit spread
  5. 2003Rebuild testable trading rules after a drawdown
  6. 2005Forex stops, lot count, and reward as one budget
  7. 2010Predefined rules before discretion in a mechanical trading system
  8. 2010Evaluating euro-gold intraday lead-lag rules
  9. 2011How to turn an FDA-calendar sample into a testable bio-runup procedure
  10. 2012First-hour countertrend entries after broken levels
  11. 2012Time-box simulation before live decision pressure
  12. 2013Adding markets without liquidity and emotion rules
  13. 2013Precommit the exits on leveraged trades
  14. 2013Check the currency cross, the margin, then the demo fill
  15. 2014Test entry, exit and abstention as one procedure
  16. 2015Paper-trade the system you refuse to complicate
  17. 2015Four-step system vetting before live trading
  18. 2015Price and volume rules over pattern shortcuts
  19. 2017Closing a Friday news fade into one entry and exit procedure
  20. 2019Hype-resistant trading process: paper checks and ruin risk
  21. 2020Paper trading cannot validate a live decision process
  22. 2020Tenth-size futures as a small-account ruin filter
  23. 2020Evaluating systems with paper trading and walk-forward windows
  24. 2020Sizing protective puts with micro index options
All 34 readings tagged Paper trading simulation
Also on Paper trading simulation5 readings