INTCUSDT · recomputed every 15 minutes
Intel (INTC) technical analysis
Where every indicator in the terminal stands on INTCUSDT, the Binance perpetual contract on Intel, right now, on the hourly, four-hour and daily bar. Free to read, no account needed.
INTCUSDT tracks the price of Intel, but it is a Binance perpetual contract, not the exchange-listed security. It trades 24/7, and outside US exchange hours it moves on thin volume. US exchange right now: pre-market.
Bearish
15% of the directional vote points up
14 of 86 directional indicators read up, 72 read down. A weak reading counts as half a vote, so the share above is not the plain count.
21 indicators give no reading on this bar. 16 measure range or volume only and never vote on direction.
Computed at 13:25 UTC on the closed bar that opened at 12:00 UTC
Base rule set: the server runs the indicator barometer and the stock rules, without the premium methodologies the terminal loads for a signed-in trader.
How the verdict moved
The share of the directional vote on every closed bar the scheduled run has stored. The dashed guides mark the bands: above the upper one the verdict reads bullish, below the lower one bearish.
Bearish·held since Nov 12, 11:00
Bullish on 51% of the bars, bearish on 35%, mixed on 14%. The verdict changed 48 times over the period.
Collected since Nov 5, 14:00, 167 bars on the 1 hour horizon. A gap in the strip is a stretch the scheduled run missed, not a market without a verdict.
What the rule engine found
Short setup·confidence 61·trend down
- Entry
- $60.52
- Stop
- $61.73
- First target
- $58.91
- Risk to reward
- 1.33
Rules that fired
- Bearish Closing Marubozu1
- 3 bear candles + rising volume1
- 3-day down with volume1
- MFI hidden bullish divergence1
- AO bearish saucer1
Indicator by indicator
Every indicator in the terminal's registry, read on the same closed bar and sorted into the groups the terminal uses. Point at a tile for the full name and its state.
Trend
6 up · 35 down · 5 quiet
- AlligatorAlligator (Bill Williams): clear down
- ALMAArnaud Legoux Moving Average: leaning down
- AroonAroon: clear down
- ADXAverage Directional Index: neutral or no reading
- CamPPCamarilla Pivots: clear up
- CKSChande Kroll Stop: clear down
- DM SCDM Setup Countdown: neutral or no reading
- DEMADouble EMA: clear down
- EMAExponential Moving Average: clear down
- FibPPFibonacci Pivots: leaning up
- FractalsFractals (Bill Williams): neutral or no reading
- HalfTrendHalfTrend: clear down
- HMAHull Moving Average: leaning down
- IchimokuIchimoku Cloud: clear down
- InertiaInertia: leaning down
- KAMAKaufman Adaptive Moving Average: clear down
- LinRegLinear Regression: leaning down
- LRCLinReg Channel: leaning down
- LRSLinReg Slope: leaning down
- LC SignalsLorentzian Signals: neutral or no reading
- MGDMcGinley Dynamic: leaning down
- MPMedian Price: leaning up
- MAMAMESA Adaptive Moving Average: clear down
- EnvelopeMoving Average Envelope: leaning down
- NWENadaraya-Watson Envelope: leaning down
- OHLC4OHLC4 Average Price: clear down
- PSARParabolic SAR: leaning up
- PPPivot Points: leaning up
- PivotHLPivot Points High Low: neutral or no reading
- PFEPolarized Fractal Efficiency: clear down
- RainbowRainbow Moving Average: clear down
- RWIRandom Walk Index: clear down
- Range FilterRange Filter: clear down
- SMASimple Moving Average: clear down
- SMMASmoothed Moving Average: leaning down
- STSupertrend: clear down
- T3Tillson T3: leaning down
- TEMATriple EMA: clear down
- TPTypical Price: clear down
- VIDYAVIDYA: clear down
- VWMAVolume Weighted MA: clear down
- VIVortex Indicator: leaning down
- WMAWeighted Moving Average: clear down
- WoodPPWoodie Pivots: leaning up
- ZLEMAZero-Lag EMA: leaning down
- ZigZagZig Zag: clear down
Momentum
1 up · 9 down · 2 quiet
- ASIAccumulative Swing Index: clear down
- ADXRAverage Directional Movement Rating: contracting
- CFOChande Forecast Oscillator: clear down
- CCCoppock Curve: leaning down
- ERElder Ray: clear up
- KSTKnow Sure Thing: clear down
- MACDMACD: clear down
- MRSMansfield Relative Strength: neutral or no reading
- MomMomentum: clear down
- PPOPercentage Price Osc: clear down
- PMOPrice Momentum Oscillator: clear down
- ROCRate of Change: clear down
Oscillators
5 up · 12 down · 13 quiet
- ACAccelerator Oscillator: clear up
- AOAwesome Oscillator: leaning down
- BOPBalance of Power: leaning down
- CMOChande Momentum Osc: neutral or no reading
- CCICommodity Channel Index: neutral or no reading
- CRSIConnorsRSI: neutral or no reading
- DPODetrended Price Osc: clear down
- DMDM Marker: neutral or no reading
- FFTFFT Dominant Cycle: neutral or no reading
- FishRSIFisher RSI: clear down
- FisherFisher Transform: clear up
- GatorGator Oscillator (Bill Williams): neutral or no reading
- IMIIntraday Momentum Index: neutral or no reading
- LCLorentzian Classification: clear up
- MESAMESA Sine Wave: clear up
- QQEQQE MOD: leaning down
- QStickQStick: leaning down
- RSIRelative Strength Index: neutral or no reading
- RVIRelative Vigor Index: leaning down
- STCSchaff Trend Cycle: neutral or no reading
- SQZMOMSqueeze Momentum: leaning down
- StochStochastic: neutral or no reading
- SMIStochastic Momentum Index: clear down
- StochRSIStochastic RSI: neutral or no reading
- TRIXTRIX: leaning up
- TSITrue Strength Index: clear down
- UOUltimate Oscillator: neutral or no reading
- ValueValue Chart: clear down
- WTWaveTrend Oscillator: leaning down
- %RWilliams %R: neutral or no reading
Volatility
0 up · 4 down · 10 quiet
- ATR%ATR Percent: expanding
- ATRAverage True Range: contracting
- %BBollinger %B: clear down
- BBWBollinger Band Width: contracting
- BBBollinger Bands: leaning down
- CVChaikin Volatility: expanding
- CHOPChoppiness Index: expanding
- DCDonchian Channel: leaning down
- HVHistorical Volatility: expanding
- KCKeltner Channel: leaning down
- MIMass Index: contracting
- NATRNormalized Average True Range: expanding
- StdDevStandard Deviation: contracting
- UIUlcer Index: contracting
Volume
2 up · 12 down · 7 quiet
- A/DAccumulation/Distribution: clear down
- AVWAPAnchored VWAP: neutral or no reading
- CMFChaikin Money Flow: clear down
- COChaikin Oscillator: clear down
- EMVEase of Movement: leaning down
- FIForce Index: clear down
- HPIHerrick Payoff Index: leaning up
- BW MFIMarket Facilitation Index: contracting
- MFIMoney Flow Index: neutral or no reading
- NVINegative Volume Index: clear down
- OBVOn-Balance Volume: clear down
- PVIPositive Volume Index: leaning up
- PVTPrice Volume Trend: clear down
- RVOLRelative Volume: expanding
- sVWAPSession VWAP: leaning down
- VOLVolume: expanding
- VOVolume Oscillator: expanding
- VROCVolume ROC: expanding
- VWAPVWAP: leaning down
- VWAP±σVWAP Bands: leaning down
- WADWilliams Accumulation/Distribution: clear down
Key levels
Pivot levels for the current period, computed four ways. A price that two methods agree on is listed once and names both.
| Level | Price | From price | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | $74.31 | +22.8% | classic |
| R2 | $73.78 | +21.9% | Woodie |
| R2 | $67.96 | +12.3% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | $64.92 | +7.3% | classic |
| R4 | $64.67 | +6.9% | Camarilla |
| R1 | $64.04 | +5.8% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | $63.85 | +5.5% | Woodie |
| Last close | $60.52 | — | — |
| R3 | $60.09 | -0.7% | Camarilla |
| PP | $57.68 | -4.7% | Fibonacci, classic, Camarilla |
| PP | $57.15 | -5.6% | Woodie |
| S1 | $51.33 | -15.2% | Fibonacci |
| S3 | $50.95 | -15.8% | Camarilla |
| S1 | $48.29 | -20.2% | classic |
| S2 | $47.41 | -21.7% | Fibonacci |
| S1 | $47.22 | -22.0% | Woodie |
| S4 | $46.37 | -23.4% | Camarilla |
| S2 | $41.05 | -32.2% | classic |
| S2 | $40.52 | -33.1% | Woodie |
Structure around price
Live zones from the Smart Money detectors, nearest to price first. Swept liquidity and filled gaps are left out.
Structure reads bearish·price sits in the discount half of the last leg
- Fair value gap$61.21 – $62.26+2.0%
- Order block$57.26 – $58.11-4.7%
- Order block$56.72 – $56.91-6.1%
- Fair value gap$65.80 – $66.40+9.2%
- Order block$54.47 – $55.34-9.3%
- Order block$66.47 – $66.62+10.0%
How to read the verdict
The verdict is a vote, not a forecast. The server runs every indicator in the terminal's registry on the last closed bar and asks each one a single question: does your reading point up or down right now. A clear reading counts as a full vote, a weak one as half, and indicators that only measure range or volume stay out of the count entirely, because expanding volatility says nothing about direction.
The share you see is that vote, scaled to the indicators that had a reading at all. Above 58 percent it is called bullish, below 42 bearish, and everything between is mixed. The thresholds are wide on purpose: a market where six indicators out of ten lean one way is not a market with a direction.
The rule engine underneath answers a different question. It does not count indicators, it checks named conditions, and it stays silent unless one of them clears its threshold. The two can disagree, and when they do, the disagreement is the useful part of the page.
Levels and structure
Pivot levels come from the previous period's high, low and close, computed four ways. They are arithmetic, not opinion: the same input gives the same numbers to everyone looking at this instrument. Where two methods land on the same price, the table lists that level once and names both, because agreement between methods is itself an argument for the level.
The structure block is different. Those zones come from detectors that look for where price left an imbalance or took out a pool of orders, and a zone stays on the list only while it is still unspent. A swept level or a filled gap drops off, which is why the list is short by design.
What moves the Intel read
Intel has spent recent years losing ground to AMD in processors and to Asian contract manufacturers in chip making, and its stock trades on restructuring news as much as on results: plant plans and a government stake in the company. Such news has no calendar, and it can move the price further in one session than the indicators had moved in the weeks before.
That makes the verdict on INTCUSDT less steady than its trend would suggest. The level table is the more useful half of the page here: after a news jump the question is whether price holds the level it reached, and the vote catches up only later.
Why does the terminal show a different number?
This page runs the base rule set. The terminal loads five premium methodologies on top of it for a signed-in trader, and those rules add their own votes to the count. On the same instrument and the same bar the direction usually agrees, the exact percentage often does not.
How fresh is this?
A scheduled run recomputes every instrument every fifteen minutes and stores the result, so the page reads a stored row and answers in milliseconds. The time of that run is printed next to the verdict. Bar lengths start at one hour: on a shorter bar a fifteen-minute cycle would show the previous bar as if it were the current one.
Is this a recommendation?
No. It is a reading of public price data by a fixed set of formulas, published the same way for everyone, with no view of your account, your horizon or your risk. Entry, stop and target under the rule engine are that engine's arithmetic, not a suggestion to place an order.
TradersWeek publishes this analysis for information only. It is not investment advice, not a personal recommendation and not an offer to trade. Markets carry a risk of loss, and a past reading of an indicator says nothing about a future price.
Other instruments