2002issue C031-3
Option income after volatility and capital gates
A historical options-income workflow treated selling as a last step. Extreme volatility first decided whether a sale was allowed, a hard equity cap decided whether size was allowed, and only then did premium sales beyond support and resistance become one testable rule with a written exit.
- Implied volatility authorized an options sale when prices looked stretched or volatility reached extremes; it was not a reason to chase the next major turn.
- A position-concentration-limit of about 3 to 7 percent of trading capital, plus one position across several markets, kept a single loss from ending further trading.
- The option-income-strategy sold premium beyond mapped intermediate support or resistance, waited days or weeks for a predetermined credit, and used a prewritten failure plan.
- Execution-drag, idle-cash-interest, paper-rehearsal, and a planned-price fill rule sat inside the procedure, including leaving cheap buybacks unfilled.
Reading the workflow as three gates
The archive workflow replaced attempts to call major turning points with an option-income-strategy: sell premium beyond calculated intermediate support and resistance, then use a written exit if the plan failed.
TradersWeek editorial reading: treat that workflow as three gates in order. Implied volatility decides whether selling is even allowed. A position-concentration-limit decides whether size is allowed. Only then do support-resistance premium sales become one testable income rule with a written exit.
Gate one: whether selling is allowed
Implied volatility is a weeks-to-months regime reading that treats stretched prices and extreme volatility as conditions that authorize selling rather than as reasons to chase direction.
Selling was the intended action when a market looked inflated, volatility reached extremes, or prices posted significant highs or lows. Directional turning-point calls were not the job of this step.
Gate two: whether size is allowed
A position-concentration-limit is a filter that caps how much equity one trade or one market can consume so a single loss cannot stop further trading.
Risk was capped at about 3 to 7 percent of trading capital per trade. 100 to 200 percent payoff hunts that required large bets were rejected. Overlap was avoided by preferring one position across several markets over several positions in one market.
Gate three: the income rule and the written exit
Once selling and size were both allowed, the option-income-strategy sold premium beyond mapped intermediate support or resistance. The holding-period action was a patient wait of days or weeks toward expiration or the next setup, accepting a predetermined credit instead of chasing outsized percentage gains.
A written exit applied if the plan failed. Every trade also required a written adjustment if it did not follow the plan.
Costs, idle cash, and paper-rehearsal
Execution-drag is commissions plus slippage, treated as a system input that can decide the month before any signal is taken. Commissions and slippage were treated as business costs that could decide a winning or losing month, and lower advertised rates were not assumed to produce better fills.
Idle-cash-interest is interest on uncommitted balances, used to offset execution-drag and required as an account condition. Uncommitted cash was to be held in Treasury bills so that interest could offset execution costs. Firms that paid no interest were rejected.
Paper-rehearsal is simulated testing and third-party review of entries, exits, and adjustments before live capital is used. Ideas were to be paper-tested and reviewed before live risk.
Planned price or no fill
Orders were not to be filled unless the planned price was obtained. That rule covered buybacks of cheap out-of-the-money options: after prints of 0.08, a 0.06 bid, and a 0.04 settlement, the order was still left unfilled.
All readings on this track · 15 readings
- 1991Keep one risk ceiling after equity highs
- 1999Pre-trade size filters for expectancy and ruin
- 2000Budget the loss before entry with stops and position limits
- 2002Retest the entry before you exit
- 2002Option income after volatility and capital gates
- 2002Cap, scale, and delever when research buys late
- 2003Staying power starts as a planned-loser sizing rule
- 2006Leverage caps and concentration limits
- 2007A first-trade survival sequence for leveraged futures
- 2010Bound trend risk before the trade is placed
- 2011Event shocks, size caps, and second-order reweights
- 2014A copied scale-in ladder is not a personal risk plan
- 2018Worst-day caps for clustered system books
- 2019Pair-spread layer limits and event shocks
- 2020Pretrade quantity filters that bound account risk