Skip to main content
Track Black-Scholes Model
17 / 18
Library

2018issue C0229

Implied volatility as an option-premium construction gauge

Implied volatility is the volatility a pricing model infers when it is inverted on a live option quote. Placing that reading in its own history is presented as a way to judge whether listed options are relatively cheap or expensive before a premium-buying or premium-selling structure is chosen.

  • Implied volatility is the volatility output obtained when an options pricing model is given an option’s current market price and solved for volatility rather than for a theoretical price.
  • A higher observed option price produces a higher implied volatility, and a lower observed option price produces a lower implied volatility, because larger embedded time premium maps to a higher reading.
  • Each listed option has its own implied volatility, while practitioners often average implied volatility across the options on one underlying and compare that average with the same series’ historical range.
  • High implied volatility is treated as evidence that a large amount of time premium is built into option prices, and a historically low reading is framed as a cheap-premium regime in which constructions that buy time premium are typically preferred.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Inverting a pricing model for implied volatility

Implied volatility is the volatility output obtained when an options pricing model is given an option’s current market price and solved for volatility rather than for a theoretical price.

The Black-Scholes model is presented as a standard pricing model that can compute a theoretical fair value for a call or put from strike, underlying price, time remaining to expiration, an interest rate, expected dividends if any, and a volatility input. The same model can be inverted on the live quote so that the unknown is volatility instead of price.

When that model is inverted on the live quote, a higher observed option price produces a higher implied volatility and a lower observed option price produces a lower implied volatility.

Time premium inside the quoted price

An option’s market price is described as intrinsic value plus extrinsic value. Intrinsic value is the in-the-money amount, equal to how far the underlying already sits beyond the strike. The extrinsic component is also called time premium, the compensation demanded for taking the risk of selling the option.

Larger embedded time premium corresponds to higher implied volatility, and smaller embedded time premium corresponds to lower implied volatility. High implied volatility is treated as evidence that a large amount of time premium is built into option prices, while low implied volatility is treated as evidence that much less time premium is built in.

Cheap or expensive against its own history

Each listed option has its own implied volatility, while practitioners often average implied volatility across the options on one underlying. Comparing a security’s current average implied volatility with that same series’ historical range is presented as an objective way to judge whether its options are relatively cheap or expensive.

A historically low implied-volatility reading, illustrated by 90-day at-the-money implied volatility on a gold-miners exchange-traded fund making a new four-year low, is framed as a cheap-premium regime in which constructions that buy time premium are typically preferred.

GDX 90-day at-the-money implied volatility, 2013–2017

Ninety-day at-the-money implied volatility on GDX falls to about 25 by late 2017, a new four-year low on this plot, which the column treats as options being cheap. Values were read off the black IV series in Figure 1, not from a published table.
Ninety-day at-the-money implied volatility on GDX falls to about 25 by late 2017, a new four-year low on this plot, which the column treats as options being cheap. Values were read off the black IV series in Figure 1, not from a published table.GDX · 2013-12 to 2017-12 · 2013-12-17T00:00:00.000Z to 2017-12-01T00:00:00.000Z

Digitized from the plotted >90-day ATM IV line. Last printed IV is the 25 label at the right edge; earlier points are approximate monthly readings from the raster and should not be treated as exact prints. GDX candlesticks on the left scale were not carried over because the archive chart has a single y-axis.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
17 of 18 in the Black-Scholes Model track
201918-22 pp.Next on Black-Scholes ModelBlack-Scholes construction from a covered-call balance sheetA stock path from 100 to either 150 or 50 implies a call hedge ratio of 0.5, so one long share is offset by selling two calls.
All readings on this track · 18 readings
  1. 1988Critiquing Black-Scholes early exercise on futures options
  2. 1988Constructing option premiums against a Black-Scholes baseline
  3. 1989Limit fills around option fair value
  4. 1990When volatility skews are regimes, not mispricings
  5. 1994Estimating closeout value on a Treasury bond options strangle
  6. 1996Constructing option theta from premium, volatility, and moneyness
  7. 2002Calendar income from volatility skew and time stops
  8. 2003Constructing option value from historical and implied volatility
  9. 2004Calendar construction from exercise style, time budget, and carry
  10. 2005A mid-life payoff chart is a volatility-regime assumption
  11. 2005Exotic option payoffs beyond the vanilla premium
  12. 2006Auditing index volatility inputs in call income studies
  13. 2008Ratio write delta adjustment when the tape rises
  14. 2010Expiration-dated volatility cones as portfolio context
  15. 2015Auditing buy-write recovery overlays against pricing and scenario breaks
  16. 2015Odd-lot mini-option hedges versus implied volatility
  17. 2018Implied volatility as an option-premium construction gauge
  18. 2019Black-Scholes construction from a covered-call balance sheet
All 20 readings tagged Black-Scholes Model
Also on Black-Scholes Model5 readings