Skip to main content
Track Market making
7 / 7
Library

2012issue C076-7

Broken quotes as liquidity events

A strategy can stop producing the intended results for more than one reason. The archive describes live-screen recognition of failed algorithms. Editorial reading: treat a decaying personal system and a broken venue algorithm as different problems, and classify an unusual book as residual liquidity to take, a quote to post, or a flow state to skip.

  • A strategy that once produced the intended results can later stop doing so for more than one reason, and modifying it is not always preferable to abandoning it.
  • Professional algorithms can fail from mistyped input, a programming defect, or a complete system outage.
  • Identifying unusual activity requires prior knowledge of usual behavior and continuous live-screen observation.
  • Editorial reading: classify an unusual book as residual liquidity to take, a quote to post, or a flow state to skip, rather than patch yesterday's rules or match millisecond turnover.
Entries in this reading3 entries

When a working system stops

A strategy that once produced the intended results can later stop doing so for more than one reason. When a system stops working, modifying it to recover prior results is not always preferable to abandoning that system.

System failure is not limited to retail procedures. Professional systems that rely on complex algorithms can fail as well.

How an algorithm fails

An algorithm can fail because of mistyped input, a programming defect, or a complete system outage. In the 2012 equity-market setting described, algorithmic or high-frequency activity accounted for about half of trading volume and was also becoming more common in currency markets. A broken quote in that setting is a market event, not proof that a personal rule set should be rewritten.

Unusual activity is a live-screen fact

Recognizing that an algorithm has failed requires prior knowledge of the usual behavior of a given equity or currency pair so that unusual activity can be identified. That identification depends on continuous live-screen observation rather than intermittent review.

Design a new system instead of matching speed

High-frequency participants had taken the role once held by floor traders and could complete stock entries and exits in milliseconds. Remaining viable in that environment was framed as a need to design new systems rather than to match millisecond-scale turnover directly.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
7 of 7 in the Market making track
1995Track finished · Next track: Market orderCanceled prints versus executable fills52 readings
All readings on this track · 7 readings
  1. 2001Displayed size, venue rules, and execution costs
  2. 2004Opening auction envelopes and crutch pairs
  3. 2005Electronic index futures: spread quotes that follow the tape
  4. 2007Pairs, hedges, vanishing bids, and the cost of liquidity
  5. 2012A transaction levy makes one-tick market making unexecutable
  6. 2012Visible opening depth versus internalized subpenny priority
  7. 2012Broken quotes as liquidity events
All 9 readings tagged Market making
Also on Market making5 readings