Skip to main content
Track Elliott wave counting
7 / 14
Library

2002issue C081-2

Auditing five-wave counts for overlap and length

A long-practicing wave counter said published five-wave drawings broke two standard impulse tests on overlap and middle-swing length. The editorial reply kept the method and treated the pictures as degree-illustrations. TradersWeek editorial view: a failed picture is a counting problem, not a rewrite of the method.

  • An impulse-wave count can be rejected when the fourth swing enters first-swing territory or when the middle swing is the shortest of the three directional swings.
  • A long-practicing wave counter said each illustrated five-wave sequence violated at least one of those two constraints, and usually both.
  • The editorial reply said the underlying wave method had not been rewritten, that the drawings were made to show intermediate and primary waves, and that a slight fourth-swing overlap may appear in those drawings.
  • TradersWeek editorial view: a published picture that fails those tests is a wave-counting problem, not a license to rewrite the method.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Read five-wave labels as an audit

TradersWeek editorial view: treat impulse labeling as a diagram audit. Before a five-wave drawing is used as an instructional example, check two structural questions. Does the fourth swing stay out of first-swing territory? Is the middle swing not the shortest of the three directional swings?

The next sections report a historical workflow. TradersWeek commentary is labelled as editorial and is not part of the archive record.

Two constraints that can reject a count

An impulse-wave is a five-swing directional structure whose labels can be rejected if the middle swing is the shortest or the fourth swing enters first-swing territory.

Wave-counting assigns sequential labels to price swings so a proposed impulse can be checked against those constraints. Wave-four-overlap is the defect in which the fourth swing enters the price range already traveled by the first swing. The third-wave-length-constraint is the requirement that the middle swing is not the shortest of the three directional swings.

What a long-practicing wave counter reported

A long-practicing wave counter compared published five-wave drawings with those two standard impulse constraints: the fourth swing should not enter first-swing territory, and the middle swing should not be the shortest.

Each illustrated five-wave sequence was said to violate at least one of those two constraints and usually both.

What the editorial reply accepted

The editorial reply stated that the underlying wave method had not been rewritten. The same reply said the drawings were made to show intermediate and primary waves.

That purpose matches a degree-illustration: a multi-scale drawing meant to show larger intermediate and primary impulses rather than a single small-degree five-wave set. The editorial reply accepted that a slight overlap of the fourth swing into first-swing territory may appear in those drawings.

Keep the picture and the method separate

TradersWeek editorial view: a failed drawing can still be a degree-illustration of larger waves. That does not convert wave-four-overlap into a valid small-degree impulse, and it does not waive the third-wave-length-constraint. Re-count the swings, or read the picture as a multi-scale sketch rather than as a finished five-wave lesson.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
7 of 14 in the Elliott wave counting track
20041-5 pp.Next on Elliott wave countingA completed supercycle count as a Fibonacci ratio laboratoryA completed five-wave supercycle count on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, from the 1932 low to the January 2000 high, covers 68 years of price history and is treated as a finished structure.
All readings on this track · 14 readings
  1. 1982Why wave counting stops full Elliott automation
  2. 1988Counting the 1987 Grand Supercycle peak as three claims
  3. 1990Promoting wave degree after a near-full retracement
  4. 1991A locked gold zigzag that had to produce two prices
  5. 2001Constructing Elliott wave counts with Fibonacci ratios
  6. 2002Constructing nested Elliott wave counts with ratio clusters
  7. 2002Auditing five-wave counts for overlap and length
  8. 2004A completed supercycle count as a Fibonacci ratio laboratory
  9. 2011The wave count as a falsifiable trade hypothesis
  10. 2014Constructing Elliott correction counts with Renko and zigzag
  11. 2015ABC wave labels as a square-of-nine timing hypothesis
  12. 2017Top-down Elliott wave count alignment
  13. 2019Wave-degree discipline for a 2018-2019 US long-wave top
  14. 2019Treat a completed cycle peak as a laboratory for repeating wave ratios
All 14 readings tagged Elliott wave counting
Also on Elliott wave counting5 readings