ATOMUSDT · recomputed every 15 minutes
Cosmos technical analysis
Where every indicator in the terminal stands on ATOMUSDT right now, on the hourly, four-hour and daily bar. Free to read, no account needed.
Bearish
38% of the directional vote points up
29 of 86 directional indicators read up, 57 read down. A weak reading counts as half a vote, so the share above is not the plain count.
21 indicators give no reading on this bar. 16 measure range or volume only and never vote on direction.
Computed at 13:25 UTC on the closed bar that opened at 12:00 UTC
Base rule set: the server runs the indicator barometer and the stock rules, without the premium methodologies the terminal loads for a signed-in trader.
How the verdict moved
The share of the directional vote on every closed bar the scheduled run has stored. The dashed guides mark the bands: above the upper one the verdict reads bullish, below the lower one bearish.
Bearish·held since Nov 12, 12:00
Bullish on 36% of the bars, bearish on 53%, mixed on 11%. The verdict changed 35 times over the period.
Collected since Nov 5, 14:00, 167 bars on the 1 hour horizon. A gap in the strip is a stretch the scheduled run missed, not a market without a verdict.
What the rule engine found
Short setup·confidence 79·trend down
- Entry
- $1.39
- Stop
- $1.41
- First target
- $1.37
- Risk to reward
- 1.33
Rules that fired
- MACD bearish crossover1
- Bearish VWAP breakout with volume1
- VWAP bounce (0.22 ATR)1
- %R bearish failure swing1
- Price crossed below WMA 201
Indicator by indicator
Every indicator in the terminal's registry, read on the same closed bar and sorted into the groups the terminal uses. Point at a tile for the full name and its state.
Trend
10 up · 31 down · 5 quiet
- AlligatorAlligator (Bill Williams): leaning up
- ALMAArnaud Legoux Moving Average: leaning down
- AroonAroon: clear down
- ADXAverage Directional Index: neutral or no reading
- CamPPCamarilla Pivots: clear up
- CKSChande Kroll Stop: clear up
- DM SCDM Setup Countdown: neutral or no reading
- DEMADouble EMA: clear down
- EMAExponential Moving Average: clear down
- FibPPFibonacci Pivots: leaning up
- FractalsFractals (Bill Williams): neutral or no reading
- HalfTrendHalfTrend: clear down
- HMAHull Moving Average: leaning down
- IchimokuIchimoku Cloud: clear down
- InertiaInertia: leaning down
- KAMAKaufman Adaptive Moving Average: leaning down
- LinRegLinear Regression: leaning down
- LRCLinReg Channel: leaning down
- LRSLinReg Slope: clear up
- LC SignalsLorentzian Signals: neutral or no reading
- MGDMcGinley Dynamic: clear down
- MPMedian Price: leaning down
- MAMAMESA Adaptive Moving Average: clear down
- EnvelopeMoving Average Envelope: leaning down
- NWENadaraya-Watson Envelope: leaning down
- OHLC4OHLC4 Average Price: leaning down
- PSARParabolic SAR: clear up
- PPPivot Points: leaning up
- PivotHLPivot Points High Low: neutral or no reading
- PFEPolarized Fractal Efficiency: leaning down
- RainbowRainbow Moving Average: clear down
- RWIRandom Walk Index: clear down
- Range FilterRange Filter: clear down
- SMASimple Moving Average: clear down
- SMMASmoothed Moving Average: clear down
- STSupertrend: clear down
- T3Tillson T3: leaning down
- TEMATriple EMA: clear up
- TPTypical Price: leaning down
- VIDYAVIDYA: leaning down
- VWMAVolume Weighted MA: clear down
- VIVortex Indicator: leaning down
- WMAWeighted Moving Average: clear down
- WoodPPWoodie Pivots: leaning up
- ZLEMAZero-Lag EMA: leaning down
- ZigZagZig Zag: clear up
Momentum
1 up · 9 down · 2 quiet
- ASIAccumulative Swing Index: leaning down
- ADXRAverage Directional Movement Rating: contracting
- CFOChande Forecast Oscillator: clear down
- CCCoppock Curve: leaning down
- ERElder Ray: leaning up
- KSTKnow Sure Thing: clear down
- MACDMACD: leaning down
- MRSMansfield Relative Strength: neutral or no reading
- MomMomentum: clear down
- PPOPercentage Price Osc: leaning down
- PMOPrice Momentum Oscillator: clear down
- ROCRate of Change: clear down
Oscillators
10 up · 7 down · 13 quiet
- ACAccelerator Oscillator: clear up
- AOAwesome Oscillator: leaning down
- BOPBalance of Power: clear up
- CMOChande Momentum Osc: neutral or no reading
- CCICommodity Channel Index: neutral or no reading
- CRSIConnorsRSI: neutral or no reading
- DPODetrended Price Osc: clear down
- DMDM Marker: neutral or no reading
- FFTFFT Dominant Cycle: neutral or no reading
- FishRSIFisher RSI: clear down
- FisherFisher Transform: leaning down
- GatorGator Oscillator (Bill Williams): neutral or no reading
- IMIIntraday Momentum Index: neutral or no reading
- LCLorentzian Classification: leaning up
- MESAMESA Sine Wave: clear up
- QQEQQE MOD: clear up
- QStickQStick: leaning up
- RSIRelative Strength Index: neutral or no reading
- RVIRelative Vigor Index: clear up
- STCSchaff Trend Cycle: neutral or no reading
- SQZMOMSqueeze Momentum: leaning down
- StochStochastic: neutral or no reading
- SMIStochastic Momentum Index: clear up
- StochRSIStochastic RSI: neutral or no reading
- TRIXTRIX: clear down
- TSITrue Strength Index: clear up
- UOUltimate Oscillator: neutral or no reading
- ValueValue Chart: clear down
- WTWaveTrend Oscillator: clear up
- %RWilliams %R: neutral or no reading
Volatility
0 up · 4 down · 10 quiet
- ATR%ATR Percent: contracting
- ATRAverage True Range: contracting
- %BBollinger %B: clear down
- BBWBollinger Band Width: contracting
- BBBollinger Bands: leaning down
- CVChaikin Volatility: contracting
- CHOPChoppiness Index: expanding
- DCDonchian Channel: leaning down
- HVHistorical Volatility: expanding
- KCKeltner Channel: leaning down
- MIMass Index: contracting
- NATRNormalized Average True Range: contracting
- StdDevStandard Deviation: contracting
- UIUlcer Index: contracting
Volume
8 up · 6 down · 7 quiet
- A/DAccumulation/Distribution: clear up
- AVWAPAnchored VWAP: neutral or no reading
- CMFChaikin Money Flow: clear up
- COChaikin Oscillator: clear up
- EMVEase of Movement: clear up
- FIForce Index: clear up
- HPIHerrick Payoff Index: leaning up
- BW MFIMarket Facilitation Index: expanding
- MFIMoney Flow Index: neutral or no reading
- NVINegative Volume Index: leaning down
- OBVOn-Balance Volume: leaning down
- PVIPositive Volume Index: clear up
- PVTPrice Volume Trend: clear up
- RVOLRelative Volume: expanding
- sVWAPSession VWAP: leaning down
- VOLVolume: expanding
- VOVolume Oscillator: expanding
- VROCVolume ROC: expanding
- VWAPVWAP: leaning down
- VWAP±σVWAP Bands: leaning down
- WADWilliams Accumulation/Distribution: leaning down
Key levels
Pivot levels for the current period, computed four ways. A price that two methods agree on is listed once and names both.
| Level | Price | From price | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | $1.64 | +17.5% | classic |
| R2 | $1.62 | +16.4% | Woodie |
| R2 | $1.53 | +10.2% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | $1.47 | +5.7% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | $1.47 | +5.6% | classic |
| R4 | $1.45 | +4.1% | Camarilla |
| R1 | $1.44 | +3.3% | Woodie |
| Last close | $1.39 | — | — |
| R3 | $1.38 | -1.1% | Camarilla |
| PP | $1.37 | -1.6% | Fibonacci, classic, Camarilla |
| PP | $1.35 | -2.7% | Woodie |
| S1 | $1.27 | -8.9% | Fibonacci |
| S3 | $1.23 | -11.6% | Camarilla |
| S2 | $1.21 | -13.4% | Fibonacci |
| S1 | $1.20 | -13.6% | classic |
| S1 | $1.17 | -15.8% | Woodie |
| S4 | $1.16 | -16.9% | Camarilla |
| S2 | $1.10 | -20.7% | classic |
| S2 | $1.09 | -21.8% | Woodie |
Structure around price
Live zones from the Smart Money detectors, nearest to price first. Swept liquidity and filled gaps are left out.
Structure reads bearish·price sits in the discount half of the last leg
- Fair value gap$1.41 – $1.42+1.6%
- Fair value gap$1.35 – $1.36-2.6%
- Order block$1.42 – $1.44+2.8%
- Order block$1.33 – $1.33-4.4%
- Fair value gap$1.45 – $1.47+4.6%
- Fair value gap$1.32 – $1.33-4.8%
How to read the verdict
The verdict is a vote, not a forecast. The server runs every indicator in the terminal's registry on the last closed bar and asks each one a single question: does your reading point up or down right now. A clear reading counts as a full vote, a weak one as half, and indicators that only measure range or volume stay out of the count entirely, because expanding volatility says nothing about direction.
The share you see is that vote, scaled to the indicators that had a reading at all. Above 58 percent it is called bullish, below 42 bearish, and everything between is mixed. The thresholds are wide on purpose: a market where six indicators out of ten lean one way is not a market with a direction.
The rule engine underneath answers a different question. It does not count indicators, it checks named conditions, and it stays silent unless one of them clears its threshold. The two can disagree, and when they do, the disagreement is the useful part of the page.
Levels and structure
Pivot levels come from the previous period's high, low and close, computed four ways. They are arithmetic, not opinion: the same input gives the same numbers to everyone looking at this instrument. Where two methods land on the same price, the table lists that level once and names both, because agreement between methods is itself an argument for the level.
The structure block is different. Those zones come from detectors that look for where price left an imbalance or took out a pool of orders, and a zone stays on the list only while it is still unspent. A swept level or a filled gap drops off, which is why the list is short by design.
What moves the ATOM read
When Cosmos drifts in one direction for weeks, the oscillator group does something that looks like a warning and usually is not: it sits at an extreme, oversold or overbought, bar after bar. In a trend that is simply what the reading looks like, and an oversold oscillator on its own is not a reason to expect a turn.
The barometer keeps the groups apart for exactly this reason. A bearish verdict carried by the trend group, with oscillators pinned to the floor, describes a market that is still falling. A turn starts to look real only when the trend group itself begins to split.
Why does the terminal show a different number?
This page runs the base rule set. The terminal loads five premium methodologies on top of it for a signed-in trader, and those rules add their own votes to the count. On the same instrument and the same bar the direction usually agrees, the exact percentage often does not.
How fresh is this?
A scheduled run recomputes every instrument every fifteen minutes and stores the result, so the page reads a stored row and answers in milliseconds. The time of that run is printed next to the verdict. Bar lengths start at one hour: on a shorter bar a fifteen-minute cycle would show the previous bar as if it were the current one.
Is this a recommendation?
No. It is a reading of public price data by a fixed set of formulas, published the same way for everyone, with no view of your account, your horizon or your risk. Entry, stop and target under the rule engine are that engine's arithmetic, not a suggestion to place an order.
TradersWeek publishes this analysis for information only. It is not investment advice, not a personal recommendation and not an offer to trade. Markets carry a risk of loss, and a past reading of an indicator says nothing about a future price.
Other instruments