Skip to main content
Track Renko chart
12 / 14
Library

2019issue C0148-56

Brick sampling changes what a volatility envelope can show

A brick-aware volatility envelope was specified so band width can still expand and contract when the chart is built from equal-size bricks. Classic deviation bands and that brick-aware reading locate sideways channels, support, and resistance in different ways.

  • A brick-aware volatility envelope was specified so band width can still expand and contract when the chart is built from equal-size bricks instead of equal-time bars.
  • On a brick chart, a conventional volatility envelope can fail to make those width changes visible, which is the stated reason a separate envelope was introduced.
  • A side-by-side comparison treats the brick-aware envelope as a tracker of price and brick structure, and treats classic deviation bands as the more volatility-sensitive locator of sideways, well-defined channels.
  • A separately smoothed typical-price midline lets the envelope and the moving-average support and resistance line use different lookbacks.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Sampling by brick size instead of clock time

A brick series of a given calendar window usually contains fewer bricks than a time-bar series of the same window, because quiet or sideways stretches can be absorbed into a single brick.

A brick-aware volatility envelope was specified so that band width can still expand and contract when the chart is built from equal-size bricks instead of equal-time bars. On a Renko chart, bricks replace equal-time bars, so the same sampling change applies.

On a brick chart, a conventional volatility envelope can fail to make those width changes visible, which is the stated reason a separate envelope construction was introduced.

How the published envelope is built

One published construction sets the upper envelope from a weighted average plus that average scaled by an average true range term, and the lower envelope from the same average minus a reduced-range term.

The same construction also plots a separately smoothed typical-price midline, so the envelope and the moving-average support and resistance line are not forced to share one lookback.

The brick-aware envelope was demonstrated on a mean-brick S&P 500 chart and on an average-true-range range chart of a currency pair, showing that the study was meant to travel across both brick and range sampling.

Different questions about channels

A side-by-side comparison treats the brick-aware envelope as a tracker of both price and brick structure, and treats classic deviation bands as the more volatility-sensitive locator of sideways, well-defined channels.

Editorial note: in that comparison, Bollinger Bands are the classic deviation-band reading. They are used to locate a sideways, well-defined channel. The brick-aware envelope is used to follow price together with the brick structure that remains after quiet stretches have been absorbed.

Support and resistance on a separate average

A complementary moving-average reading treats repeated tests of an average as support or resistance in a continuing trend, and treats a break through one or more averages as a candidate reversal condition.

Because the midline is smoothed separately from the envelope, that support and resistance reading can use a different lookback from the band width. Editorial note: the archive presents this as a complementary reading, not as a replacement for the envelope.

SVE volatility bands versus 2.4-sigma Bollinger bands on 2018 daily prices

On the published NeuroShell comparison the SVE upper and lower bands keep a fairly even width down the 2018 slide, while the 20-bar Bollinger upper band at 2.4 standard deviations stretches higher around the February spike and then contracts with the later grind. A trader comparing those envelopes sees classic deviation bands flag the early-year volatility burst more dramatically, and the SVE construction track price as a tighter channel. Monthly levels were read from the labeled 1.12–1.26 price scale and the 2018 month axis on that chart; they are approximate.
On the published NeuroShell comparison the SVE upper and lower bands keep a fairly even width down the 2018 slide, while the 20-bar Bollinger upper band at 2.4 standard deviations stretches higher around the February spike and then contracts with the later grind. A trader comparing those envelopes sees classic deviation bands flag the early-year volatility burst more dramatically, and the SVE construction track price as a tighter channel. Monthly levels were read from the labeled 1.12–1.26 price scale and the 2018 month axis on that chart; they are approximate.Daily · 2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2018-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

The NeuroShell formulas in the source fix SVE at period 20, deviation 2.4 and low-band adjust 0.9, and Bollinger bands at 20 bars with 2.4 standard deviations. The pane is clock-time daily bars, not renko bricks.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
12 of 14 in the Renko chart track
201916-21 pp.Next on Renko chartA consecutive Renko brick count as a mechanical entry-exit procedureA consecutive modified Renko brick count can be encoded as an automatic expert that alerts once a chosen up-bar or down-bar count is reached, with the expert, new-trade, auto-trade, and auto-close switches enabled.
All readings on this track · 14 readings
  1. 2007Renko brick construction and breakout rules
  2. 2014Modified Renko brick size from tick inputs
  3. 2014Renko brick increment and open construction
  4. 2014Modified renko construction with RSI bands and a trend filter
  5. 2014Construction checklist for a brick-chart crossover and same-session breakout
  6. 2015Optimizing virtual bar size as a trend filter
  7. 2015Constructing Renko energy bands so support and resistance arrive as pre-marked leans
  8. 2018Five-rule entries and exits with Elliott waves and Renko bricks
  9. 2018Modified Renko charts as a filter for fake breakouts
  10. 2018V-Trade reversal, retrace, and continuation rules
  11. 2018A finished impulse, a Fibonacci target, and a reversing Renko brick as one test
  12. 2019Brick sampling changes what a volatility envelope can show
  13. 2019A consecutive Renko brick count as a mechanical entry-exit procedure
  14. 2019Renko brick scale as a falsifiable trend hypothesis
All 15 readings tagged Renko chart
Also on Renko chart5 readings