2003issue C061-3
Constructing a pre-trade stop and review procedure
A written plan, a setup picture, a stop-defined size, and a scheduled review can be built as one procedure so entry, abstention, and exit are outputs of the same rules.
- Treat the written plan as both the start and the constraint of the process, including goals, money-management rules, allowed market conditions, and times not to trade.
- Scan with a pre-formed setup picture, rank remaining candidates against the plan, and discard any trade that fails the reward-to-risk gate.
- Derive share size from a fixed dollar loss at the planned stop, then wait for the target or stop unless a predefined early-exit rule applies.
- Review every completed trade against the same prior steps and keep losing trades as the primary record of procedure errors.
A written trading plan is treated as both the start and the constraint of the process. It records goals, money-management rules, allowed market conditions, and explicit times not to trade. Those records feed a checklist-process: a written sequence that turns rule inputs, market state, and execution constraints into a single enter, pass, or later-review signal over the system holding period.
The trading-psychology-process is that same sequence. Entry, exit, and abstention stay testable because the rules, rather than mood, produce the signal.
Start from the written plan
Nothing in the later scan rewrites the plan. Allowed conditions and the listed times not to trade remain in force before a chart is opened. Money-management rules stay attached to the plan so size, loss limits, and the stop decision have a fixed source.
Scan with a setup picture
Candidate selection is reduced to a setup-picture, a reduced visual of the plan’s entry criteria used to scan charts without inventing a trade from unmatched structure. Unmatched charts are set aside. Setup criteria are not rewritten to fit whatever appears on the screen.
Chart names and a preconceived market-direction view are withheld during the scan so opposite-direction setups that still match the picture are not discarded.
Keep the shortlist comparable
After the first pass, remaining setups are ranked with a point system keyed to the plan’s setup criteria so the shortlist stays comparable. The rank does not replace the plan. It only orders candidates that already match the picture.
Use the reward-to-risk gate
Target and stop levels are taken from the chart, converted into a reward-to-risk ratio, and accepted only if that ratio meets the plan. Otherwise the trade is discarded. That check is the reward-to-risk-gate: a comparison of chart-derived target distance to stop distance against a plan threshold that either admits or discards the candidate.
Relative strength versus the broader market or sector, and the path or session timing into the trigger, can still force a pass after the setup and ratio have already qualified.
Size from a fixed dollar loss
Share size is derived from a fixed dollar loss at the planned stop, with plan-level caps on one-trade and one-day loss, so size expands only when stop distance allows it. That computation is equalized-risk-size: position size set so a stop hit costs a standardized dollar amount rather than a gut-chosen share count.
The stop-loss is a pre-entry bound on loss and exposure, set from account equity, stop distance, and intended risk, then left in force for the life of the position.
Wait for the planned target or stop
Once a valid trade is open, default action is to wait for the planned target or stop. Early exits are limited to predefined cases such as severe news, an objective reversal of the assumed market direction, or a time-stop measured in bars. A time-stop closes the trade after a set number of bars if neither the target nor the protective stop has been reached. The stop itself is not to be ignored.
Review the procedure after every trade
Every completed trade is reviewed against the same prior steps. Losing trades are retained as the primary source of procedure errors rather than discarded. That check is the post-trade-review: a scheduled check of whether the checklist, stop, and size rules were followed, used to revise the plan rather than to relive the outcome.
QQQ entry, stop, and target for the 8 August 2002 long

The same paragraph writes potential reward as 4.50 from 23.50 minus 22.90. The named target is 23.40, and 4.50 does not match that subtraction; 23.50 is treated only as a scale print. Slippage and commissions are excluded.
All readings on this track · 135 readings
- 1987Pair each checklist step with its decision state
- 1987Position secrecy as decision-process control
- 1987When profits break the trading process
- 1988Treat action-seeking as a veto before any signal
- 1988Entry, exit, and abstention as one practiced procedure
- 1988Making inner conflict a testable trading rule
- 1988The chart is only half the trading procedure
- 1988Negotiate conflicting parts before the signal
- 1989Commitment turns trading rules into one procedure
- 1989Confidence, discipline and the fit of a trading procedure
- 1990Encoding expert hunches into a mechanical trading loop
- 1991The consecutive-loss halt as the trading system
- 1991A fuzzy membership checklist for trade signals
- 1991Overconfidence as a skipped pre-trade checklist
- 1991A source-reliability audit for trade signals
- 1991Shared rules fail without an execution checklist
- 1991The daily study block as a low-risk checklist
- 1992A bear-market loss review that rewrites the pre-trade checklist
- 1993Unspoken beliefs that veto system rules
- 1993Why a mechanical system beats betting harder when the story looks cheaper
- 1993A usable process over a perfect trader standard
- 1993Remold the decision-map after a traumatic trade
- 1994Keep entry, exit and sit-out as one procedure
- 1994Pre-trade gates for belief and state
- 1994Known failure points inside the yen triangle phase checklist
- 1994When a comfort ceiling, not market state, is the failure mode
- 1994Trading commitment as a balanced decision process
- 1994Constructing a pre-trade discipline checklist
- 1995Futures systems start with whether to trade
- 1995Stopping points as checklist and stop failures
- 1995When analysis and execution must become one procedure
- 1995A decision-process database from analyst to trader
- 1995Decisive execution as one tested procedure
- 1996The unfinished-system trap in simple decision rules
- 1996When risk breaks practiced system execution
- 1996Treat the mechanical signal as a draft, not a decision
- 1996Critique of decision states that break system rules
- 1996State-gate checklist for trading decisions
- 1996Personality-fit rules before earned intuition
- 1996The commitment gap as a testable decision process
- 1996Test decision style as one trading procedure
- 1997Mechanical trading before subjective judgment
- 1997Belief checklists that invalidate mechanical systems
- 1998Mechanical rules against mindtraps
- 1999The profit target as a trading discipline lens
- 1999When mechanical rules replace judgment in the trade process
- 1999Trading discipline as one testable procedure
- 1999Daily pre-open map as one procedure
- 2000Session veto from daily readiness
- 2000Anger buildup as an untested system input
- 2000Construct separate research and live-trade question checklists
- 2000Operator-state as a first-class trading rule
- 2001Day-trading rules need a pre-trade decision process
- 2001Review the operator before you rewrite the plan
- 2001Critique of the informal trading pause
- 2001Specificity turns wishes into checkable trading rules
- 2002The pre-entry plan that locks exits and size
- 2002Risk identity as a pre-trade system gate
- 2002When elapsed time rewrites trade rules
- 2002One written system, faster exits, and the belief gate
- 2003Countable decision trees for entry and abstention
- 2003Constructing a pre-trade stop and review procedure
- 2004Psychological wounds that override a tested system
- 2004A hot streak does not retire the trading checklist
- 2005Why mechanical trade plans fail without execution discipline
- 2005Resentment as a construction input for trade decisions
- 2005A daytrade as one written procedure
- 2006Write the pre-trade plan as one procedure before entry
- 2006When a winning streak makes the trade checklist optional
- 2007An entry needs a pre-trade risk bound and a post-trade debrief
- 2007A pre-session futures plan that locks entries, exits, and stops
- 2007Maxims fail without one testable procedure
- 2007Personality-fit and holding horizon before the pre-trade checklist
- 2008Push-button systems versus a testable decision process
- 2008Written rules omit the operator and the implicit filters
- 2008A Pre-trade checklist before emotion takes over
- 2008System design between the mechanical black box and checklist judgment
- 2008Trade history as a checklist for entry, exit, and abstention
- 2008Mechanical rules without a decision process
- 2008Parable checklists for entry, exit and abstention
- 2010Keep rule-based entries clear of news bias
- 2010Self-control zones before the pre-trade checklist
- 2010Treat the pair-desk day as one testable procedure
- 2010Use a five-factor checklist instead of pattern labels
- 2010Listed currency futures versus spot forex as a pre-trade venue checklist
- 2010Rule overload, unfinishable checklists, and tight stops
- 2010Pre-trade checklist versus automatic stops
- 2010Skipping signals after a losing streak is a new system
- 2010Stand aside until the relationship breaks
- 2010A software catalog fails the checklist without one testable procedure
- 2011Checklist rules versus unwritten indicator judgment
- 2011The handoff test for self-coached trading plans
- 2011Unify locate status, written rules, and self-talk on one checklist
- 2012A pocket card and a setup-chart as the session-plan
- 2012Close system construction with a review checklist
- 2012A pre-trade checklist versus in-trade emotion
- 2013The ten-question alignment gate when traders lose the path
- 2013A stuck-point audit for stalled trading decisions
- 2013Why rule-based entries need false-trigger checks
- 2013One procedure for liquidity rules and abstention
- 2013The month-open window is unfinished without cash default and a substitution checklist
- 2014Waiting fails when the pre-trade checklist is too wide
- 2014A swing procedure with a checklist, layered stops, and an emotion handoff
- 2014System design as a critique of forecast-worship
- 2014Consultant hiring as an accept-or-abstain checklist
- 2014One procedure for entry, exit and abstention
- 2014A trading system that cannot decide before the chart opens
- 2014The checklist veto when tools override the plan
- 2014Write the holding-period style before any daytrading rules
- 2015A pre-trade checklist when volatility turns rules into panic
- 2015A checklist, psychology gate, and moving-average procedure
- 2015Write forex entry and sit-out rules before you score the links
- 2015Daily if-then checklists versus year-ahead market forecasts
- 2015Workstation readiness in the pre-trade execution checklist
- 2015An unprepared trade fails the pre-trade checklist
- 2015Evaluate a system with one pre-trade checklist
- 2015The pre-trade checklist as one testable procedure
- 2015News-aware forex process with defined stops
- 2016Slow thinking over gut feel in complex markets
- 2016When a market-structure story rewrites a checklist yes
- 2017Constructing an options trading-plan from a self-inventory
- 2017A price-first checklist for noncooperative market games
- 2017A pre-trade risk checklist versus profit-first thinking
- 2018A forex onboarding ladder is not a decision process
- 2018Pre-trade regret scripts for entry and abstention
- 2018Audit the plan while the tape stays forgiving
- 2018Constructing a sortable pre-trade checklist
- 2018Forex myths that break a testable decision process
- 2018Why trading checklists must beat inherited confidence
- 2019Leverage as a pre-trade gate in mechanical systems
- 2019Critique of impulse trading as a testable system
- 2020One checklist for breakout entry, stops, and sitting out
- 2020A continuity checklist for a blank Sunday-night system desk
- 2020After an extended bar, the checklist must still be able to refuse
- 2020Write one procedure before outsourcing system decisions