Skip to main content
Track Leverage control
2 / 9
Library

1998issue C071-7

Combine seasonal, election, and yield rules as one procedure

The archive workflow writes November to January, March to April, and July windows, the election-year regime, and a lagged 30-year yield gap as invest-or-cash rules, then applies a 200% exposure ceiling and checks stability.

  • Seasonal-trading writes calendar months and election-cycle years as testable entry, cash, and abstention rules over the system holding period.
  • System-optimization combines those rules in steps and treats every extra regime-cell as a fitting risk, so a coarse-permutation of four starting cells is used instead of a full month-by-year table.
  • The yield-trend-filter reads the prior month's 30-year yield minus the prior month's six-month average so a cash or exit state does not rest on look-ahead-bias.
  • Leverage-control applies a 200% ceiling before the combined signal is used, and stability checks watch for compounding-illusion with return variability, worst 12-month loss, decade windows, and small weight perturbations.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Write three rules as one schedule

The archive workflow turns monthly equity-index closes into invest-or-cash rules. Seasonal-trading writes calendar months and election-cycle years as testable entry, cash, and abstention rules over the system holding period. System-optimization then combines those rules in steps so the whole procedure can be tested, with every extra cell treated as a fitting risk.

The calendar layer used windows around November to January, March to April, and July, with September treated as the weak window from 1950 to 1995. The four-year election calendar was a second regime: remain invested in preelection and election years and move to cash in postelection and midterm years.

Lag the yield-trend-filter

A third rule compares the 30-year yield with its six-month average and treats a gap above that average of more than 0.1% as the cash or exit state. The yield-trend-filter is that lagged gap between the long Treasury yield and its recent average, used to stay invested, reduce size, or stand aside.

The implementable filter uses the prior month's yield minus the prior month's six-month average, because the current month's close is not known before month-end. A fitted line from last month's yield gap to this month's equity return is only a coarse inverse-correlation check. The intended input is the trend of the yield, not its level.

Combine through a few regime cells

A many-exception rule set is treated as more likely to be fitted to one sample, and harder to follow under stress, than a few exception-free rules. A regime-cell is one bucket formed by crossing a calendar window with an election-cycle pair so exposure can be assigned without a thicket of exceptions.

Crossing a half-year seasonal split with lumped election pairs yields four cells that can be added, multiplied, or weighted. Expanding to 12 monthly slots or 24 month-by-cycle slots raises fitting risk. A coarse-permutation keeps a small starting grid, such as two half-year windows crossed with two lumped election pairs plus a yield state, used to limit fitting. Restricting the design that way leaves four starting permutations and is offered as a check against a fully iterated month-by-year table.

Cap stacked exposure

Stacking seasonal and yield exposure scores without a cap can take leverage above 2:1. Leverage-control is a hard bound on exposure, set from account risk and regime strength before entry and kept while the position is open. A 200% ceiling is applied so the loss or exposure decision is bounded before the combined signal is used.

Check stability for compounding-illusion

Ending equity can look superior only because one or two early outperforming years later compound. Compounding-illusion is that pattern: ending equity that looks superior only because one or two early years kept multiplying, not because later years still beat a fully invested path. Stability is checked with return variability, worst 12-month loss, decade windows, and small weight perturbations.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
2 of 9 in the Leverage control track
19991-3 pp.Next on Leverage controlLaddered beta exposure with leveraged index fundsListed S&P 500 designer-fund betas ranged from about -2.0 to 2.0, and mixing one leveraged fund with a money-market sleeve can fill intermediate leveraging levels between that multiple and zero.
All readings on this track · 9 readings
  1. 1996Evaluate S&P 500 seasonal windows before using leverage
  2. 1998Combine seasonal, election, and yield rules as one procedure
  3. 1999Laddered beta exposure with leveraged index funds
  4. 1999Mechanical timing as an error budget, not an alpha story
  5. 2002Multiplier, margin, and stop discipline on cash-settled index minis
  6. 2008Harvest windows inside a commodity regime repricing
  7. 2011Daytrading as an incomplete decision process
  8. 2012Halloween seasonal window with commodity overlay and leverage control
  9. 2014A quiet tape is a regime test for trend-following, pairs, and leverage
All 70 readings tagged Leverage control
Also on Leverage control5 readings