Skip to main content
BTC / USDT———ETH / USDT———SOL / USDT———BNB / USDT———XRP / USDT———DOGE / USDT———TON / USDT———AVAX / USDT———LINK / USDT———ADA / USDT———TRX / USDT———DOT / USDT———BTC / USDT———ETH / USDT———SOL / USDT———BNB / USDT———XRP / USDT———DOGE / USDT———TON / USDT———AVAX / USDT———LINK / USDT———ADA / USDT———TRX / USDT———DOT / USDT———
Тарифы
cryptoOct 1, 2026, 6:23 AM

EU Regulators Scrutinize Binance’s Use of MiCA Exemption

European supervisors are checking whether Binance's use of MiCA's reverse solicitation carve-out meets the exemption's narrow conditions, as the exchange serves parts of the EU without a full CASP licence.

European regulators are examining whether Binance's reliance on a narrow exemption under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) complies with EU rules, as the exchange continues to serve customers in parts of the bloc without holding a full MiCA Crypto-Asset Service Provider licence.

The provision at issue is reverse solicitation, which allows an EU customer to approach a crypto firm based outside the bloc for services on their own initiative. MiCA permits that activity without prior authorization for the foreign provider, but only where the relationship is genuinely started at the customer's "own exclusive initiative." It is not intended to serve as a general route for an offshore exchange to actively target European clients while sidestepping MiCA licensing.

A deliberately narrow carve-out

Regulators are now assessing whether Binance's use of the exemption fits those conditions and subsequent guidance from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). ESMA has repeatedly stressed that reverse solicitation must be read narrowly, and regulatory guidance indicates that solicitation can cover not just direct advertising but also online promotions, sponsorships and influencer activity aimed at attracting EU clients. The restriction also outlasts the first transaction: an offshore provider cannot treat an independently requested service or asset as blanket permission to market unrelated products afterwards. That poses a compliance challenge for global platforms whose websites, apps and campaigns reach users across many jurisdictions.

Binance does hold registrations through some European entities, but it has not obtained a MiCA authorization that would give it a single passportable licence across the bloc. The company withdrew an application in Greece earlier in 2026, leaving its longer-term European licensing strategy under closer attention.

MiCA's rules for crypto-asset service providers became applicable on December 30, 2024, while member states could grant existing national operators transitional periods running as late as July 1, 2026. Those grandfathering arrangements were never meant to offer indefinite EU market access. As they lapse, firms serving European customers increasingly need a MiCA licence, another legally valid regulatory basis, or must restrict their services.

The scrutiny does not by itself establish any breach by Binance. Any formal determination would hinge on the specific customer interactions, marketing practices and services regulators review, and the central question remains whether particular European clients truly initiated their relationships without prior solicitation or promotion. Regulators have also warned against structuring marketing or client-acquisition strategies around the exemption, signalling a broader shift: the focus is now on whether business practices genuinely satisfy the carve-out, not merely whether a firm invokes it.

Source: FinanceFeeds