Skip to main content
Track Volume-weighted RSI
1 / 8
Library

1985issue C051-8

Session windows, volume weights, and divergence in RSI construction

Classic RSI maps the ratio of average up-close changes to average down-close changes onto a 0-100 scale. The lookback, the average, the price sample, and any volume weight are construction choices, and the overbought, oversold, and divergence readings belong to that finished contract.

  • Classic RSI maps the ratio of average up-close changes to average down-close changes onto a 0-100 scale, with a 14-period lookback as the common classroom example.
  • Averages taken over a fixed count of up days and down days can reach far older than the advertised lookback: the NASDAQ Index from 8 January 1985 to 12 March 1985 had only 14 down days across 43 trading days. Recomputing the same ratio on the most recent 14 sessions keeps the broad contour but changes how many turns appear and how sharply they are drawn.
  • An exponential average gives more influence to the newest observations. Midrange, typical price, mixed open-high-low-close, or same-session close-versus-open increments change smoothness, and the close-versus-open variant was presented as one of the few whose contour emphasized peaks as well as troughs.
  • A volume-weighted RSI multiplies each up or down change by that session's volume before the ratio is formed. Guides at 30 and 70 were original overbought and oversold references to retune by instrument, and price-indicator divergence appeared on 47.4% of examined commodity cases, slightly less than half the time.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What classroom RSI maps

Classic relative strength index maps the ratio of average up-close changes to average down-close changes onto a 0-100 scale, with a 14-period lookback used as the common classroom example. That map is a 0-100 momentum transform of average upward price changes against average downward price changes over a stated sampling interval and lookback.

Lock the lookback to actual sessions

If the averages are taken over a fixed count of up days and down days rather than the same number of calendar sessions, a one-sided move can pull in data far older than the advertised lookback. On the NASDAQ Index from 8 January 1985 to 12 March 1985 there were only 14 down days across 43 trading days.

Recomputing the same ratio on only the most recent 14 trading sessions keeps the broad contour of the original oscillator but changes how many turns appear and how sharply they are drawn. The lookback window is the set of observations admitted into the average: an event-count of up or down days is not the same as a calendar run of the same length.

Choose how new data is weighted

Substituting an exponential average for an arithmetic average inside the RSI ratio assigns more influence to the newest observations. That exponential average is a smoothing choice, not a change in the advertised span.

Pick the price sample

The price sample is the increment fed into the ratio. Replacing close-to-close increments with midrange, typical price, or mixed open, high, low, and close differences changes smoothness. A same-session close-versus-open increment was presented as one of the few variants whose contour emphasized peaks as well as troughs.

Volume weight changes the size of each move

A volume-weighted RSI multiplies each up day and each down day by that session's volume before the ratio is formed, so a price change on heavy volume moves the oscillator more than the same price change on light volume. Participation then changes the size of the oscillator move.

In a year-long equity comparison, a marked low on the volume-weighted oscillator coincided with reduced volume in early October 1984.

Reread the bands and divergence

The examples drew horizontal guides at 30 and 70 because those were the original overbought and oversold references, and stated that those levels should be retuned for the stock or commodity under study. Those overbought-oversold bands are instrument-specific marks on the 0-100 scale, not universal constants.

A standard reading of RSI is price-indicator divergence: price making a higher high or lower low while the oscillator does not. Divergence is that chart condition, a new high or low in price that the oscillator fails to confirm. A contemporaneous commodity study reported that pattern on 47.4% of examined cases, slightly less than half the time.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
1 of 8 in the Volume-weighted RSI track
19891-5 pp.Next on Volume-weighted RSIConstructing the money-flow index as a volume-weighted relative-strength oscillatorA standard relative-strength oscillator is computed from closing prices alone and cannot register the trading activity that accompanies a price change.
All readings on this track · 8 readings
  1. 1985Session windows, volume weights, and divergence in RSI construction
  2. 1989Constructing the money-flow index as a volume-weighted relative-strength oscillator
  3. 1992Constructing a money flow index from volume-weighted RSI
  4. 1994Constructing the money flow index as a volume-weighted relative strength index
  5. 2002Combine adaptive bands with the Relative Strength Index and volume-weighted RSI
  6. 2015Rebuilding a volume-weighted RSI and checking price-indicator divergence
  7. 2015Constructing the slow volume strength index from signed volume
  8. 2020Constructing a probability-defined trend filter
All 8 readings tagged Volume-weighted RSI
Also on Volume-weighted RSI5 readings