Skip to main content
Track Volume-weighted RSI
8 / 8
Library

2020issue C1114-19

Constructing a probability-defined trend filter

Trend can be constructed as a signal-to-noise ratio in which directional price movement is the signal and random movement is the noise. Common momentum indicators share that form and tend to lag. An alternative codes new highs and new lows as Bernoulli trials and uses the difference of their probabilities as a bounded trend-strength measure.

  • Trend can be constructed as a signal-to-noise ratio, with directional price movement as the signal and random movement as the noise.
  • Common momentum trend indicators are similar ratios of a momentum term to a noise term, so they tend to be highly correlated and to display lag from averaging and smoothing.
  • New-high and new-low breaks can be treated as Bernoulli trials, with a large-sample no-trend expectation near 0.5.
  • The difference between those probabilities is a bounded trend-strength measure, with idealized values of 1.0 for a perfect uptrend, -1.0 for a perfect downtrend, and 0 for no trend.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Trend as a signal-to-noise ratio

Trend can be constructed as a signal-to-noise ratio in which directional price movement is the signal and random movement is the noise.

Common momentum trend indicators are similar ratios of a momentum term to a noise term and therefore tend to be highly correlated and to display lag from averaging and smoothing.

New highs and new lows as Bernoulli trials

An alternative construction estimates new-high and new-low probabilities by treating each period's break of the prior period high or low as a Bernoulli trial, with a large-sample no-trend expectation near 0.5.

The probability series is built by coding 1 or 0 for a new high and a new low each period, including both events on an outside day and neither on an inside day, then averaging the binary series over a chosen lookback such as 25 periods.

A bounded trend-strength measure

The difference between new-high probability and new-low probability can be used as a bounded trend-strength measure, with idealized values of 1.0, -1.0, and 0 for a perfect uptrend, perfect downtrend, and no trend.

Editorial reading of the construction

Editorial interpretation: Once the lookback is chosen and each period is coded for a new high and a new low, the no-trend expectation near 0.5 and the sign of the probability difference become an explicit hypothesis about the chart. That statement is a construction choice, not a claim about later market results.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
8 of 8 in the Volume-weighted RSI track
2000Track finished · Next track: Volume-weighted average priceVolume-weighted average price as a baseline for indicator construction36 readings
All readings on this track · 8 readings
  1. 1985Session windows, volume weights, and divergence in RSI construction
  2. 1989Constructing the money-flow index as a volume-weighted relative-strength oscillator
  3. 1992Constructing a money flow index from volume-weighted RSI
  4. 1994Constructing the money flow index as a volume-weighted relative strength index
  5. 2002Combine adaptive bands with the Relative Strength Index and volume-weighted RSI
  6. 2015Rebuilding a volume-weighted RSI and checking price-indicator divergence
  7. 2015Constructing the slow volume strength index from signed volume
  8. 2020Constructing a probability-defined trend filter
All 8 readings tagged Volume-weighted RSI
Also on Volume-weighted RSI5 readings