Skip to main content
Track Triangular moving average
5 / 8
Library

1998issue C031-3

Paired tests for moving-average lag and smoothness

An 11-period exponential average and a 3-period average applied five times were treated as sharing five days of linear-input-lag, yet they parted on a constructed tent, a noisy flat line, and zero crossings of one-period change on daily closes.

  • Linear-input-lag can treat a longer single-pass exponential average and a multi-pass exponential average as equally delayed even when a peaked path shows extra phase-lag for the stacked version.
  • Smoothness scored as leftover distance from a noisy flat line favored the single 11-period exponential average, which also showed less delay than the five-times-smoothed 3-period average.
  • On more than two years of one equity's daily closes, the multi-pass average's one-period rate of change crossed zero about half as often as the 11-period exponential average.
  • A reply held that extra delay for the stacked average appears on sine or sawtooth input and is the counterpart of lower noise, not a denial of shared lag on a straight ramp.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What the paired scores measure

A moving average is a lookback smoother that turns ordered prices into a delayed, less noisy companion series over a stated sampling interval. Exponential smoothing is a recursive average that weights the newest observation more than older ones and can be run once or stacked on its own output. A triangular moving average is a moving average whose weights rise to the middle of the window and then fall, emphasizing the center of the lookback.

A multi-pass exponential average is a short exponential average applied to its own output several times, used as a low-noise counterpart to a longer single-pass exponential average. The archive paired an 11-period exponential moving average with a 3-period exponential average applied five times.

Linear-input-lag on a ramp and a tent

The two exponential averages were treated as sharing a five-day lag when the input was linear. Linear-input-lag is delay measured when the input is a straight ramp, which can understate delay on peaked or oscillatory paths.

On a constructed tent path that rose for 10 days and then fell for 10 days, the 11-period exponential average peaked 3 days after the crest and the five-times-smoothed 3-period average peaked 4 days after the crest. Phase-lag is how many bars a smoother's turning point trails the same turn in the raw series.

Smoothness on a noisy flat line

On a flat line with added random noise, average absolute distance from that line was used as a smoothness score. Smoothness here is how little leftover oscillation remains after filtering, scored as distance from a quiet baseline or as how rarely the one-period change crosses zero.

The single 11-period exponential average reduced that distance more than the five-times-smoothed 3-period average while also showing less delay. In that lag-matched noise test, the single exponential average was judged to smooth more than simple, weighted, triangular, and double-exponential moving averages.

A crossing count on daily closes

On more than two years of one equity's daily closes, each smoother's one-period rate of change was used to count zero-line crossings as a noise proxy. That crossing-interval test found the five-times-smoothed 3-period average crossed zero about half as often as the 11-period exponential average.

Extra delay as the counterpart of lower noise

A reply held that both smoothers still share five days of lag on linear input, that extra delay for the five-times-smoothed average appears when the input has spectral content such as a sine or sawtooth wave, and that this extra delay is the counterpart of lower noise.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
5 of 8 in the Triangular moving average track
19991-6 pp.Next on Triangular moving averageFixed-lag construction of moving-average smoothersSmoothness can be operationalized by coding each observation as up or down versus the prior one and summing the times that binary state changes.
All readings on this track · 8 readings
  1. 1989Constructing lag-matched triangular moving averages
  2. 1990Lag-aligned MACD from triangular moving averages
  3. 1990Constructing triangular moving average weights
  4. 1990Constructing a lag-aligned triangular MACD
  5. 1998Paired tests for moving-average lag and smoothness
  6. 1999Fixed-lag construction of moving-average smoothers
  7. 2003Weighting recipes inside one moving-average lookback
  8. 2010Assembling a smoothed percent-b oscillator from Heikin-Ashi and stacked averages
All 8 readings tagged Triangular moving average
Also on Triangular moving average5 readings