2020issue C1247
Handing a futures account to a manager is still a ruin problem
A commodity trading advisor can trade futures and options in a client-named account under a power of attorney. That structure does not remove leveraged speculation risk, and clients who see only an end-of-day statement may be unable to limit size until after a damaging move.
- A commodity trading advisor trades futures and options in a client-named account under a power of attorney, which is not the same as a commodity pool that combines client funds.
- Registration after a proficiency exam and National Futures Association fees is not proof of trading skill.
- Clients who see positions and balances only on an end-of-day statement may have little ability to limit exposure until after a damaging move.
- A manager can destroy client capital by trading too large on a high-conviction idea, and long-standing managers are not exempt if they are on the wrong side of a market at the wrong time.
A client-named account is not a safer structure
A commodity trading advisor trades futures and options in a client-named account under a power of attorney. That is a different structure from a commodity pool, which combines client funds into one account.
Delegated trading authority lets the manager place trades without the client approving each order. Delegating those trades does not remove the risk of leveraged futures and options speculation aimed at outperforming the market.
Registration is not proof of skill
Registration as a commodity trading advisor can be obtained by passing a proficiency exam and paying National Futures Association fees of a one-time $200 document charge plus $750 annual dues. That path is not the same as proof of trading skill.
Statements arrive after the move
Because clients often see positions and balances only on an end-of-day statement, they may have little ability to limit trading or exposure until after a damaging move. That delay is a visibility lag between live positions and the first statement that shows what was held and how equity changed.
Size can wipe out the account
A manager can destroy client capital by trading too large on a high-conviction idea even when the strategy itself is not described as the primary error. Long-standing managers are not exempt from large losses if they are on the wrong side of a market at the wrong time.
In late 2018, some option-selling programs were reported to have lost millions and their client books after short natural-gas calls and short crude-oil puts later expired worthless.
Delegating commodity speculation to avoid emotional strain can instead produce a false sense of security if the client stops watching size and survival risk.
All readings on this track · 15 readings
- 1985Event-class hazards and pre-trade survival checks
- 1985Exchange controls that close the trading-window
- 1989Scenario-checked short-call income versus directional premium
- 2003American cash-settled debit spreads run on two clocks
- 2006Trading survival as a precommitted decision process
- 2006Storm season, futures weather regimes, and contract size
- 2007Country and sector sleeves as a construction choice
- 2008Weather regimes and agricultural markets: a 2007-2008 case study
- 2010Grain price regimes start with the crop cycle, the dollar, and leftover inventories
- 2015Convert year-ahead forecasts into if-then checklists
- 2016A forecast is a hypothesis, not a sizing license
- 2016The commodity hold-forever thesis fails drawdown and ruin screens
- 2020Forecast safety after rare market shocks
- 2020Reserve-currency regime, productivity shocks, and scenario filters
- 2020Handing a futures account to a manager is still a ruin problem