Skip to main content
Track Ascending triangle
1 / 5
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

1996issue C111-6

Ascending triangle and Descending triangle breakout case study

A Triangle pattern can pause a trend or mark the last stage of that trend before a reversal. An Ascending triangle is treated as an upward-breakout setup, and a Descending triangle is treated as the inverse downward-breakout hypothesis. The same geometry can fail when demand fades, and waiting for the hypothesized breakout is presented as a trade-off between the win-loss record and some profit potential.

  • A Triangle pattern can act as a pause after a trend or as the last stage of that trend before a reversal.
  • An Ascending triangle is drawn with a flat or nearly flat top and an upward-sloping bottom and is treated as an upward-breakout setup. A Descending triangle is the inverse downward-breakout hypothesis.
  • The same Ascending triangle geometry can fail if price exits through the rising lower boundary after demand fades. A Descending triangle can exit lower without a surge in volume.
  • Waiting for a breakout in the hypothesized direction is presented as a way to improve the win-loss record at the cost of some profit potential. Daily and weekly charts are treated as useful for identification, while monthly charts are treated as too coarse.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Descending triangle3 readingsCurrent trackAscending triangle5 readingsTriangle pattern55 readings

A pause or a last stage

A Triangle pattern can act as either a pause after a trend or the last stage of that trend before a reversal. The same structure can sit inside a continuing move or appear just as that move is ending.

The archive treats the drawn geometry as a setup for a directional hypothesis, not as a finished verdict on the next move.

How the two geometries are drawn

An Ascending triangle is drawn with a flat or nearly flat top and an upward-sloping bottom, and it is treated as an upward-breakout setup.

A Descending triangle is the inverse setup and is treated as a downward-breakout hypothesis. Both remain Triangle pattern conditions that still have to resolve.

When the same geometry fails

The same Ascending triangle geometry can fail if price exits through the rising lower boundary after demand fades. A flat or nearly flat top does not keep the upward-breakout reading intact once that lower boundary gives way.

A downside exit from a Descending triangle can occur without a surge in volume. The inverse setup is still treated as a downward-breakout hypothesis, but the archive does not require a volume surge for that lower exit.

Waiting for the hypothesized breakout

Waiting for a breakout in the hypothesized direction is presented as a way to improve the win-loss record at the cost of some profit potential. The wait is framed as a trade-off, not as a free improvement.

Daily and weekly charts are treated as useful for Triangle pattern identification, while monthly charts are treated as too coarse because the pattern is time-sensitive.

Daily prices: autumn range, February high near 38, April collapse

A trader should see a long autumn-to-winter coil near 31–33, a February thrust that tags about 38, then a late-April collapse toward 21 on a volume surge—the coiled range resolving as a failed advance rather than a durable breakout. Approximate weekly prices were read from the printed daily bar chart, not from a table.
A trader should see a long autumn-to-winter coil near 31–33, a February thrust that tags about 38, then a late-April collapse toward 21 on a volume surge—the coiled range resolving as a failed advance rather than a durable breakout. Approximate weekly prices were read from the printed daily bar chart, not from a table.October 1995–May 1996 · 1995-10-02T00:00:00.000Z to 1996-05-27T00:00:00.000Z

Weekly samples of the daily OHLC bars, rounded to the nearest half dollar. The magazine raster cannot support finer precision. Volume bars are visible but unlabeled, so they are omitted.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
1 of 5 in the Ascending triangle track
20011-2 pp.Next on Ascending triangleSoybean crop regimes, triangles, and channel breaksThis editorial reading counts an ascending-triangle or price-channel break only in planting, pod-set, or late-harvest windows, and treats the same geometry as noise once the crop is known.
All readings on this track · 5 readings
  1. 1996Ascending triangle and Descending triangle breakout case study
  2. 2001Soybean crop regimes, triangles, and channel breaks
  3. 2005Reading triangles as volatility coils
  4. 2007Cup-and-handle construction versus an ascending triangle
  5. 2017Confirm an ascending triangle only after the flat cap breaks
By fieldChart patterns222 readingsBy year199680 readings
All 5 readings tagged Ascending triangle
Also on Ascending triangle5 readings
2005Reading triangles as volatility coilsDescending triangle1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdownDescending triangle2001Soybean crop regimes, triangles, and channel breaks2007Cup-and-handle construction versus an ascending triangle2017Confirm an ascending triangle only after the flat cap breaks