Skip to main content
BTC / USDT———ETH / USDT———SOL / USDT———BNB / USDT———XRP / USDT———DOGE / USDT———TON / USDT———AVAX / USDT———LINK / USDT———ADA / USDT———TRX / USDT———DOT / USDT———BTC / USDT———ETH / USDT———SOL / USDT———BNB / USDT———XRP / USDT———DOGE / USDT———TON / USDT———AVAX / USDT———LINK / USDT———ADA / USDT———TRX / USDT———DOT / USDT———
Preise
cryptoAug 24, 2026, 4:40 AM

Hyperliquid Builder Codes Daily Perpetual Volume Hits…

Hyperliquid's Builder Codes ecosystem set an all-time high of $984 million in daily perp volume on Aug. 21, while fees generated for builder protocols reached $782,000, data shows.

Hyperliquid's Builder Codes ecosystem reached an all-time high on Aug. 21, with $984 million in daily perpetual futures notional volume routed through third-party applications, according to Blockworks Research data cited by Wu Blockchain.

That figure tracks activity sent to Hyperliquid by external wallets and trading tools rather than the venue's overall turnover. The same session produced about $782,000 in protocol revenue from builder fees — the second-largest daily amount on record. MetaMask generated roughly $143,000 and Phantom roughly $114,000, contributing a combined $257,000, or nearly 33% of the total.

Builder Codes let outside applications submit orders to Hyperliquid's order book while adding a custom fee on top of executed trades. The system lives in Hyperliquid's onchain fee logic. Users must approve a builder address and set the maximum fee before orders can carry a charge, and they can revoke that approval at any time. Builder fees for perpetual futures are capped at 0.1% of trade value, while spot trades allow as much as 1%. Participants also need to keep at least $100 USDC in their perpetual accounts.

The design turns wallets into trading front ends without requiring them to develop matching engines or liquidity networks. MetaMask and Phantom initially built their businesses around self-custodial crypto storage, but both have expanded into derivatives, reflecting a broader move toward wallets as full financial interfaces. For Hyperliquid, this provides an alternative distribution route: third-party apps bring users and order flow, while Hyperliquid supplies the order book, margining and settlement infrastructure on its own Layer 1 blockchain.

The record comes as perpetual futures draw attention from U.S. policymakers considering frameworks for regulated margined digital-asset trading, which could intensify competition in a market long dominated by offshore venues and decentralized protocols. Hyperliquid's approach uses linear perpetual contracts whose prices are anchored to underlying assets through funding payments between long and short traders.

The $984 million is notional derivatives turnover, not fresh capital committed to crypto markets, and the same balances can support multiple leveraged positions. Even so, the mid-August peak gives a clear sign of how much perp flow can now be distributed through third-party interfaces: nearly $1 billion in a single day, with $782,000 of fees distributed to participating builders.

Source: FinanceFeeds