Skip to main content
BTC / USDTCRYPTO107,400+2.19%ETH / USDTCRYPTO3,840+2.13%SOL / USDTCRYPTO182.40−1.99%BNB / USDTCRYPTO652.30+0.66%XRP / USDTCRYPTO2.2150+1.61%DOGE / USDTCRYPTO0.3850−1.79%TON / USDTCRYPTO5.240+2.34%AVAX / USDTCRYPTO42.60−2.07%LINK / USDTCRYPTO22.40+2.28%ADA / USDTCRYPTO1.0520−1.68%TRX / USDTCRYPTO0.3300+0.92%DOT / USDTCRYPTO8.420+2.93%BTC / USDTCRYPTO107,400+2.19%ETH / USDTCRYPTO3,840+2.13%SOL / USDTCRYPTO182.40−1.99%BNB / USDTCRYPTO652.30+0.66%XRP / USDTCRYPTO2.2150+1.61%DOGE / USDTCRYPTO0.3850−1.79%TON / USDTCRYPTO5.240+2.34%AVAX / USDTCRYPTO42.60−2.07%LINK / USDTCRYPTO22.40+2.28%ADA / USDTCRYPTO1.0520−1.68%TRX / USDTCRYPTO0.3300+0.92%DOT / USDTCRYPTO8.420+2.93%
ราคา
cryptoJun 28, 2026, 10:35 AM

Fidelity Digital Assets Challenges Bitcoin Security Concerns Post-Halving

Analysts at Fidelity Digital Assets have pushed back against the common belief that Bitcoin's block reward halvings will weaken network security over time. They argue that economic incentives, not just subsidy size, keep the network robust.

BTCUSD

In a new report titled "Bitcoin's Programmed Security: Part One," analysts from Fidelity Digital Assets question the widely held assumption that the periodic reduction of Bitcoin mining rewards will gradually undermine the network's security.

The report argues that Bitcoin's resilience depends not only on the amount of block rewards but also on the economic incentives that make potential attacks prohibitively expensive. By shifting the focus from raw mining revenue to the broader game theory of participant behavior, Fidelity suggests the network can remain secure long after subsidies shrink.

This perspective counters the narrative that Bitcoin's security model is inherently fragile as the block reward trends toward zero. Fidelity's analysis reinforces the idea that Bitcoin's programmed security is a dynamic system rather than a simple function of miner compensation.

Source: ForkLog