XRPUSDT · recomputed every 15 minutes
XRP technical analysis
Where every indicator in the terminal stands on XRPUSDT right now, on the hourly, four-hour and daily bar. Free to read, no account needed.
Bullish
96% of the directional vote points up
94 of 101 directional indicators read up, 7 read down. A weak reading counts as half a vote, so the share above is not the plain count.
6 indicators give no reading on this bar. 16 measure range or volume only and never vote on direction.
Computed at 19.22 UTC on the bar that closed at 18.00 UTC
Base rule set: the server runs the indicator barometer and the stock rules, without the premium methodologies the terminal loads for a signed-in trader.
How the verdict moved
The share of the directional vote on every closed bar the scheduled run has stored. The dashed guides mark the bands: above the upper one the verdict reads bullish, below the lower one bearish.
Bullish·held since 24 Sep, 13.00
Bullish on 54% of the bars, bearish on 38%, mixed on 9%. The verdict changed 17 times over the period.
Collected since 21 Sep, 11.00, 80 bars on the 1 hour horizon. A gap in the strip is a stretch the scheduled run missed, not a market without a verdict.
What the rule engine found
Long setup·confidence 56·trend up
- Entry
- US$1,54
- Stop
- US$1,50
- First target
- US$1,58
- Risk to reward
- 1,33
Rules that fired
- Squeeze released — bullish explosion1
- Swing high breakout1
- CCI overbought: 1621
- CMF turned positive — buying pressure1
- BB mean reversion sell1
Indicator by indicator
Every indicator in the terminal's registry, read on the same closed bar and sorted into the groups the terminal uses. Point at a tile for the full name and its state.
Trend
41 up · 2 down · 3 quiet
- AlligatorAlligator (Bill Williams): leaning up
- ALMAArnaud Legoux Moving Average: clear up
- AroonAroon: clear up
- ADXAverage Directional Index: leaning up
- CamPPCamarilla Pivots: clear up
- CKSChande Kroll Stop: clear up
- DM SCDM Setup Countdown: clear down
- DEMADouble EMA: clear up
- EMAExponential Moving Average: clear up
- FibPPFibonacci Pivots: leaning up
- FractalsFractals (Bill Williams): no reading
- HalfTrendHalfTrend: clear up
- HMAHull Moving Average: clear up
- IchimokuIchimoku Cloud: leaning up
- InertiaInertia: leaning up
- KAMAKaufman Adaptive Moving Average: clear up
- LinRegLinear Regression: clear up
- LRCLinReg Channel: leaning up
- LRSLinReg Slope: clear up
- LC SignalsLorentzian Signals: no reading
- MGDMcGinley Dynamic: clear up
- MPMedian Price: clear up
- MAMAMESA Adaptive Moving Average: clear up
- EnvelopeMoving Average Envelope: clear up
- NWENadaraya-Watson Envelope: leaning up
- OHLC4OHLC4 Average Price: clear up
- PSARParabolic SAR: clear up
- PPPivot Points: leaning up
- PivotHLPivot Points High Low: no reading
- PFEPolarized Fractal Efficiency: clear up
- RainbowRainbow Moving Average: clear up
- RWIRandom Walk Index: leaning down
- Range FilterRange Filter: clear up
- SMASimple Moving Average: clear up
- SMMASmoothed Moving Average: clear up
- STSupertrend: leaning up
- T3Tillson T3: clear up
- TEMATriple EMA: clear up
- TPTypical Price: clear up
- VIDYAVIDYA: clear up
- VWMAVolume Weighted MA: clear up
- VIVortex Indicator: clear up
- WMAWeighted Moving Average: clear up
- WoodPPWoodie Pivots: leaning up
- ZLEMAZero-Lag EMA: clear up
- ZigZagZig Zag: clear up
Momentum
8 up · 2 down · 2 quiet
- ASIAccumulative Swing Index: clear up
- ADXRAverage Directional Movement Rating: contracting
- CFOChande Forecast Oscillator: leaning down
- CCCoppock Curve: clear up
- ERElder Ray: leaning down
- KSTKnow Sure Thing: clear up
- MACDMACD: clear up
- MRSMansfield Relative Strength: no reading
- MomMomentum: clear up
- PPOPercentage Price Osc: clear up
- PMOPrice Momentum Oscillator: clear up
- ROCRate of Change: clear up
Oscillators
25 up · 3 down · 2 quiet
- ACAccelerator Oscillator: clear up
- AOAwesome Oscillator: clear up
- BOPBalance of Power: clear up
- CMOChande Momentum Osc: clear up
- CCICommodity Channel Index: clear up
- CRSIConnorsRSI: clear up
- DPODetrended Price Osc: clear up
- DMDM Marker: clear up
- FFTFFT Dominant Cycle: no reading
- FishRSIFisher RSI: clear up
- FisherFisher Transform: clear up
- GatorGator Oscillator (Bill Williams): no reading
- IMIIntraday Momentum Index: clear up
- LCLorentzian Classification: clear up
- MESAMESA Sine Wave: clear up
- QQEQQE MOD: clear up
- QStickQStick: clear up
- RSIRelative Strength Index: clear up
- RVIRelative Vigor Index: clear up
- STCSchaff Trend Cycle: leaning down
- SQZMOMSqueeze Momentum: clear up
- StochStochastic: leaning up
- SMIStochastic Momentum Index: clear up
- StochRSIStochastic RSI: leaning up
- TRIXTRIX: leaning up
- TSITrue Strength Index: clear up
- UOUltimate Oscillator: clear up
- ValueValue Chart: leaning down
- WTWaveTrend Oscillator: clear up
- %RWilliams %R: leaning down
Volatility
4 up · 0 down · 10 quiet
- ATR%ATR Percent: expanding
- ATRAverage True Range: expanding
- %BBollinger %B: clear up
- BBWBollinger Band Width: expanding
- BBBollinger Bands: leaning up
- CVChaikin Volatility: contracting
- CHOPChoppiness Index: contracting
- DCDonchian Channel: leaning up
- HVHistorical Volatility: expanding
- KCKeltner Channel: leaning up
- MIMass Index: contracting
- NATRNormalized Average True Range: expanding
- StdDevStandard Deviation: expanding
- UIUlcer Index: expanding
Volume
16 up · 0 down · 5 quiet
- A/DAccumulation/Distribution: clear up
- AVWAPAnchored VWAP: clear up
- CMFChaikin Money Flow: clear up
- COChaikin Oscillator: clear up
- EMVEase of Movement: clear up
- FIForce Index: clear up
- HPIHerrick Payoff Index: clear up
- BW MFIMarket Facilitation Index: expanding
- MFIMoney Flow Index: clear up
- NVINegative Volume Index: clear up
- OBVOn-Balance Volume: clear up
- PVIPositive Volume Index: clear up
- PVTPrice Volume Trend: clear up
- RVOLRelative Volume: contracting
- sVWAPSession VWAP: clear up
- VOLVolume: contracting
- VOVolume Oscillator: contracting
- VROCVolume ROC: contracting
- VWAPVWAP: clear up
- VWAP±σVWAP Bands: leaning up
- WADWilliams Accumulation/Distribution: clear up
Key levels
Pivot levels for the current period, computed four ways. A price that two methods agree on is listed once and names both.
| Level | Price | From price | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | US$1,55 | +1,0% | classic |
| R2 | US$1,55 | +0,9% | Woodie |
| R2 | US$1,54 | +0,5% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | US$1,54 | +0,2% | classic |
| R4 | US$1,54 | +0,2% | Camarilla |
| R1 | US$1,54 | +0,2% | Fibonacci |
| R1 | US$1,54 | +0,1% | Woodie |
| Last close | US$1,54 | — | — |
| R3 | US$1,53 | -0,2% | Camarilla |
| PP | US$1,53 | -0,4% | Fibonacci, classic, Camarilla |
| PP | US$1,53 | -0,4% | Woodie |
| S1 | US$1,52 | -0,9% | Fibonacci |
| S3 | US$1,52 | -1,0% | Camarilla |
| S1 | US$1,52 | -1,2% | classic |
| S2 | US$1,52 | -1,2% | Fibonacci |
| S1 | US$1,52 | -1,3% | Woodie |
| S4 | US$1,52 | -1,3% | Camarilla |
| S2 | US$1,51 | -1,7% | classic |
| S2 | US$1,51 | -1,8% | Woodie |
Structure around price
Live zones from the Smart Money detectors, nearest to price first. Swept liquidity and filled gaps are left out.
Structure reads bullish·price sits in the premium half of the last leg
- Fair value gapUS$1,54 – US$1,55+0,5%
- Order blockUS$1,57 – US$1,58+2,2%
- Order blockUS$1,50 – US$1,50-2,4%
- Fair value gapUS$1,48 – US$1,49-3,4%
- Fair value gapUS$1,60 – US$1,61+4,6%
- Fair value gapUS$1,45 – US$1,47-5,1%
How to read the verdict
The verdict is a vote, not a forecast. The server runs every indicator in the terminal's registry on the last closed bar and asks each one a single question: does your reading point up or down right now. A clear reading counts as a full vote, a weak one as half, and indicators that only measure range or volume stay out of the count entirely, because expanding volatility says nothing about direction.
The share you see is that vote, scaled to the indicators that had a reading at all. Above 58 percent it is called bullish, below 42 bearish, and everything between is mixed. The thresholds are wide on purpose: a market where six indicators out of ten lean one way is not a market with a direction.
The rule engine underneath answers a different question. It does not count indicators, it checks named conditions, and it stays silent unless one of them clears its threshold. The two can disagree, and when they do, the disagreement is the useful part of the page.
Levels and structure
Pivot levels come from the previous period's high, low and close, computed four ways. They are arithmetic, not opinion: the same input gives the same numbers to everyone looking at this instrument. Where two methods land on the same price, the table lists that level once and names both, because agreement between methods is itself an argument for the level.
The structure block is different. Those zones come from detectors that look for where price left an imbalance or took out a pool of orders, and a zone stays on the list only while it is still unspent. A swept level or a filled gap drops off, which is why the list is short by design.
What moves the XRP read
XRP spends long stretches ignoring the rest of the board, then moves on news the chart could not have known about. Indicators read the aftermath, not the cause, so the verdict here describes the current state rather than extrapolating from it.
In a range the oscillator group carries more weight than the trend group, and the barometer shows this plainly: trend indicators drop to no reading while oscillators keep voting. That split is not a fault in the data, it is what a range looks like from the inside.
Why does the terminal show a different number?
This page runs the base rule set. The terminal loads five premium methodologies on top of it for a signed-in trader, and those rules add their own votes to the count. On the same instrument and the same bar the direction usually agrees, the exact percentage often does not.
How fresh is this?
A scheduled run recomputes every instrument every fifteen minutes and stores the result, so the page reads a stored row and answers in milliseconds. The time of that run is printed next to the verdict. Bar lengths start at one hour: on a shorter bar a fifteen-minute cycle would show the previous bar as if it were the current one.
Is this a recommendation?
No. It is a reading of public price data by a fixed set of formulas, published the same way for everyone, with no view of your account, your horizon or your risk. Entry, stop and target under the rule engine are that engine's arithmetic, not a suggestion to place an order.
TradersWeek publishes this analysis for information only. It is not investment advice, not a personal recommendation and not an offer to trade. Markets carry a risk of loss, and a past reading of an indicator says nothing about a future price.
Other instruments
Open interest and funding for XRP